Time to drop the subsidies.

Subsidies are a form of bucking the market, as with any measures to buck the market they inevitably fail, though that doesn't stop governments from wasting taxpayers money on them and enriching those receiving the subsidies. That's not to say that there might not be a case for a limited subsidy in developing new technologies, just in order to get them off the ground, however limited ought to mean that by a certain amount of time it's sink or swim time...
Not that governments seem to have grasped this basic point.
Express.

HARD-UP families could see energy bills double to a ­whopping £3,000 a year, experts warned last night.
The forecast came as millions of households face rises of up to £140 in electricity and gas bills within weeks.
The current average dual fuel bill stands at £1,420. But, with the way prices are continuing to soar, this figure is set to double by 2020.
Mark Todd, of energy­-helpline.com, said: “Over the next seven years we could see bills hit £3,000 if current trends continue. This is a very big rise and is going to hit people extremely hard.”
Another round of price hikes is thought to be “imminent”, with firms expected to slap an extra five to 10 per cent on the annual bill.
It means that hard-pressed families will have to find up to £140 more a year as gas and electricity bills soar to £1,560.
Energyhelpline’s Mr Todd said a new wave of price hikes are likely before the beginning of winter.
He blamed investment in green energy and rising wholesale and transport costs for the rocketing bills.
Prof Fells said: “It is inevitable that the price of energy will rise, and I blame this on the huge investment in renewable energy. If the Government pursues this expansion of green energy, it will cost the bill-payer.”

 Yes, the government is wasting our money on renewable energy to face a crisis that doesn't exist save in the minds of bureaucrats, politicians and the hard of thinking leftist watermelons. With the bureaucrats and politicians I suspect it's just a means to pocket public money as part of directorships in renewable energy companies. With the watermelons I suspect that it's all just part of a plan by their leadership to take us all back to the stone-age save for a technical elite living high on the hog, I doubt it has anything to do with the good of the planet, more to do with the good of the enviroloony leadership.
People are going to die because of the government of both stripes lunacy in sticking it to us in the form of green subsidies on fuel. Our old, our sick/disabled and our very young are being sacrificed on the alter of the cruel and unforgiving green religion. That there are alternatives to renewables is known, hence the anti-fracking protests at an oil drilling rig for some reason or another. They'd rather we died in the cold than have cheap energy, their cruel god demands it, destruction of the West as a civilisation has always been at the core of leftist/watermelon policy, hence their lack of protests at what India and China do.
One day we'll kill them all though...

 

Six down many more to go

Another day another trial for child prostitution and yet again some good 'English' names are sent away to contemplate their crimes...
BBC.

Six men have been jailed for paying or offering to pay a "vulnerable and damaged" 16-year-old girl for sex.
Leicester Crown Court heard she had been used as a "sexual commodity" and left with internal injuries.
The girl told the men she was a prostitute, but the judge said they should have seen she was vulnerable and helped her.
The men, whose ages range from 20 to 39, were jailed for between eight months and five years.
Three pleaded guilty at their first appearance at Leicester Crown Court and three pleaded guilty part-way through a trial.
Judge Michael Pert QC said: "This case is a classic example of the need for the law to protect young girls from their own folly as well as from their exploitation by men."
Aabidali Mubarak Ali, Rakib Iacub, Hamza Imtiazali, Bharat Modhwadia, Chandresh Mistry and Wajid Usman all pleaded guilty to various charges.

The odd thing about this trial is that not all were muslims, one at least was a Sikh and frankly this is disturbing as I and many other hold Sikh's up to far higher standards of behaviour than muslims. The victim herself was also a Sikh and frankly you'd expect that Rakib Iacub should have known better. Two other names suggest non-islamic roots in the Indian sub-continent as well. It does however appear that Aabidali Mubarak Ali a muslim was responsible once he had his claws into the young teen in "spreading the word" about her to others.
It's also notable that the Sikh community took the law into their own hands and attacked the restaurant where the men were indulging in their lusts. One wonders what the headlines would have been had the EDL done some such thing?
But I expect we all know what the results of that would have been form the reaction of the law and the press over the London riots to patriotic Englishmen (and women) defending their homes compared to Turks or Sikhs. They get praised, we get criticised...

Not in my name, not in my interests

Cameron was whining to the press today about having to give up his cherished dream of emulating Tony Blair and leading his nation into war, albeit a war at arms length and not one that has anything to do with us.
Telegraph.

"The judgment of the Joint Intelligence Committee is that a chemical weapons attack did occur in Damascus last week; that it is highly likely that the Syrian regime was responsible; that there is some intelligence to suggest regime culpability; and that no opposition group has the capability to conduct a chemical weapons attack on this scale."
The Government's position on the legality of any action makes clear that if action in the UN security Council is blocked, the UK would still be permitted, under the doctrine of humanitarian intervention, to take exceptional measures including targeted military intervention in order to alleviate the overwhelming humanitarian suffering in Syria."
The Cabinet endorsed the recommendation from the National Security Council and the Prime Minister will set out the proposed government response in the House this afternoon.

Ok so it was Assad (probably), so what? Doesn't make him any less culpable than the atrocities committed against Christians and Assad supporters that has been committed by the rebels. This is a CIVIL WAR it has nothing to do with us whatsoever. I don't care if international law does not allow chemical weapons, it doesn't allow slavery either yet both appear to be practised by islamic states.
An Express Online poll revealed that only eight per cent of the public backed any form of intervention in Syria, I presume that those are the islamoloons infesting this country along with their allies in the hard of thinking leftist socialists, as they appear to be the only ones supporting the rebels, not even Galloway supports the fanatics whom Cameron wants to aid. A significant 41 per cent of people are against action by Britain in any circumstances, whilst only 39 per cent would only agree with a launch if the UN confirmed chemical weapons have been used by the Syrian regime and then sanctions a strike.
In other words we don't want to be drawn into a muslim problem, we have enough problems with them here.
Syria is not worth the life of a single person loyal to this country, if anything we could I suppose send our problem muslims to go fight for the rebels whilst arming Assad and dealing with their nuisance value that way.
Win win...

Not just Greece...

Some statements stick in the craw, I rather suspect the one by Angela Merkel on Greece's admission to the Euro will have ruffled a few feathers as well as having been painful to admit.
Express.

Angela Merkel said that Greece should never have been allowed into the now struggling Eurozone.
The German Chancellor put the blame on her predecessor Gerhard Schroeder, calling his decision, “wrong”.
Ms Merkel said that Greece’s entry into the Euro was one of the starting points for the current crisis, reported The Daily Telegraph.

But it wasn't just Greece now was it who fudged their economics to fit into the convergence criteria for joining the Euro? The answer lies in some of the terms of the Maastricht Treaty

The Maastricht criteria consists of four parts: price stability (inflation rate not more than 1.5 percentage points above the rate of the three best performing member states), sound public finances (public deficit should not exceed 3% of GDP), sustainable public finances (government debt should not exceed 60% of GDP) Durability of convergence (long-term interest rate should not be more than 2 percentage points above the rate of the three best performing members in terms of price stability) and exchange rate stability (participation in ERM II for at least 2 years without severe tensions.

 Not one single European country now in the Euro matched those criteria, only three (Finland, Luxembourg and Estonia) even came close. The only one that matches them all now is Denmark all the rest of the Eurozone fail in some respect of the criteria. So when Merkel tells Greece that they shouldn't have been allowed in, well Greece has some news for the Germans, they shouldn't have been allowed in either, not if the rules were applied as they were supposed to be.
Not that I'd expect any Eurocrat or EUphile to admit that the entire Euro concept is flawed, even Merkel doesn't dare admit that...

Ms Merkel added: “That [a unified Euro area] is such a treasure, such a boon, that we can’t place it in doubt.

Even if it means fudging the terms of entry...

Unwanted and unloved

Cameron was today deciding to recall parliament to decide what to do about the Syrians gassing each other, apparently WMD's are a big no, no in Cameron's eyes and he feels obliged to do something despite it being absolutely none of our business.
MSN.

Any intervention in Syria would not be about the conflict itself but preventing the use of chemical weapons by any regime, David Cameron said today, stressing no decisions about British involvement have been made.
The Prime Minister said there was never 100% certainty or a single piece of irrefutable evidence but said the world had agreed almost a century ago chemical weapons should not be used.
Decisions about British involvement have not been taken, he said, adding Parliament was the "right place to set out all of the arguments". He said action must be "proportionate, have to be legal, would have to specifically be about deterring the use of chemical weapons".
Mr Cameron said any action had to be legal, proportionate and a deterrent to the future use of such weapons.
He added: "Let me stress to people, this is not about getting involved in a Middle Eastern war or changing our stance in Syria, or going further into that conflict. It's about chemical weapons. Their use is wrong and the world should not stand idly by."

How on earth he imagines we can stop whichever faction in Syria is using the damned things is anyone's guess, take a look at Iraq to see the last attempts to try to use WMD's as an excuse.
I somehow feel that Cameron believes going in there might make him popular with his muslim pets at home despite all evidence to the contrary that they'd butcher him in a second given the chance as this young naive lady found out...

What is happening in Syria is a civil war between muslim factions and is absolutely none of our business. Our only business should be selling both sides arms to butcher each other. They are not our allies, they most definitely aren't our friends, now or ever, they are loyal to their family, their tribe and their abomination of a prophet and his barbaric god. The are not loyal to a country, they are not loyal to anyone who is not a muslim.
Sura 9:29 Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low. 
In other words they are obliged to fight us until we pay them protection money and we live by their sufferance.
That's why Cameron is playing with fire and that's why there's no place for islam in a civilised society.

Authoritarianism writ large

There are those out there who believe that voting in national and local elections should be compulsory and any who don't vote ought to be fined for having the temerity to either not be interested or in a lot of cases not supporting any of the candidates listed. So it comes as no surprise that there are proposals to make it mandatory for anyone who is old enough to vote for the first time to be forced to vote...
BBC.

Young people should be required to turn out at the first election in which they have the right to vote, the IPPR think tank has said.
The plans, to be set out in a forthcoming report, involve a small fine for young people deciding not to vote at their first election.
They would also offer first-time voters who did not back any political party a "none of the above" option.
Labour is reportedly considering whether to back the idea.
Shadow lord chancellor Sadiq Khan has also said his party might propose lowering the voting age from 18 to 16.
IPPR researchers found that the UK has one of the largest differences in voter turnout between young and old people in Europe.
In 2013 local elections, an estimated 32% of 18- to 24-year-olds voted, compared with 72% of those aged over 65, the think tank said.

I'm not surprised Labour want to lower the voting age to sixteen as most adults who work quickly realise just which party want to get their hands on their money for their grandiose (and useless) state schemes. Sixteen year olds think that helping people the Labour way is just fine and dandy as they've never been in a position to count the cost of socialist idiocy, so are more likely to vote idiot.
Still at least they are offering first time voters a 'none of the above' option, though it does appear that only first time voters will get such an option.
Yet none of the people involved in the report seem to have an idea as to why it is that people don't want to vote. Instead of making an effort to understand the disconnect, they feel it ought to be mandatory to get out there and vote, whether you want to or not. Freedom of choice also includes freedom to take responsibility for your actions or inactions. Hence we basically have the politicians we deserve as a lot of people who do vote don't understand the issues and the cost and we have a lot of people who can't be bothered because they can't see the point as 'the government always gets in' and it makes no difference to their lives either way.
Coercion will not work, it won't produce anything other than people voting once because they have too (though this may well suit Labour) voter disconnect from the political system is the real problem and forcing people to vote if they qualify for the first time will not solve this.

Someone else we don't really need here

Just what is it about this country that makes it the target for every islamic loonjob as a safe haven to spout their bile?
Actually I think we know what it is, it's called the Human Rights Act and a bunch of extreme legalists lawyers who have schemed to keep the most undesirable people from being booted out to their just deserts.
Telegraph.

The new spiritual leader of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood is living in hiding in London in fear of state-sponsored assassination, it can be disclosed.
Gomaa Amin is understood to have been made head of the Islamist organisation last week following the arrest of his predecessor in Cairo by Egypt’s military rulers. Mr Amin, 79, had flown to London about two months ago for medical treatment and as a result escaped detention when the army seized power in a bloody coup. He is now residing at an undisclosed address from which he is trying to orchestrate the Muslim Brotherhood’s response to the coup. The presence of Mr Amin in London is a potential headache for British authorities who may be obliged to provide protection for such a senior and controversial figure. The Muslim Brotherhood supports a caliphate, a unified Islamic state under Sharia law, and has been accused of fuelling religious tensions in the Middle East, particularly with the Christian minority.

So exactly why is he being allowed to stay here? I don't want anyone who has influence over people who want a new caliphate or sharia law implemented over none muslims to be anywhere near my country. The man is a dangerous fanatic and should have been denied entry to the UK simply because of who he is. He will be a magnet for islamic extremists throughout Europe and the World  many of whom thanks to the Foreign Office (Aka the camel corps) were invited here under an open door policy tso they could avoid being offed by their countries governments. Abu Qatada, Abu Hamza and Omar Bakri Mohammed the well renowned hate preachers were all allowed here under such a policy and all caused this country far more problems than their entry justified... if indeed there was any justification for allowing a pack of rabid loons into the UK.
Perhaps we should do the Egyptian people a favour and hand him back or allow him to be 'offed' anyway... pour encourager les autres... as the saying goes.

What about victims rights? Now there's a thought.

Another day, another immigrant scumbag being let off from deportation because it would breach his human rights. No thought whatsoever about the rest of us who have to live next too or come in contact with these wastes of space of course, it's all about 'their' rights.
Mail.

A foreign criminal jailed for a series of violent attacks cannot be deported because it would violate his human rights, it has been ruled.
Sanel Sahbaz, a Bosnian who now lives in Hertford, came to Britain as a child in 1993. Since 2005 he has committed a string of offences including common assault, handling stolen goods, theft, public order offences and assaulting police.
In one incident he attacked his landlord, pushing him to the floor, repeatedly kicking him and stamping on his head until the man fell unconscious.
Sahbaz, 30, qualified for automatic deportation after he was jailed for four years, and the Home Office told him he would be sent home. But he has now been told he can stay indefinitely after he brought a legal challenge under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to private and family life.

The legal profession and the various groups that support human rights for these scumbags often point out that if their rights are protected, then our rights are protected. Thing is, most of us wouldn't do what this violent little barbarian does on a day to day business either. Nor does any excuse that he came from a Bosnian warzone cut any ice with me either. You either behave, or you go willingly or not. Certainly if his family are that in love with him they can go with him or sign some sort of waiver stating he's no relative of mine and I do not wish to be associated with him.
There really is no place for the likes of Sanel Sahbaz in the UK, the Home Office had it dead right to begin with. But we have to thank Tony Blair and the Labour party for signing us up to the Odiou Human Rights Act to thank for the fact that he gets to stay. Thanks for nothing you idiot leftards.

New Zealand

Anyone out there know how to go about getting a maintenance job in New Zealand that will lead to residency?
Just asking as I've really had enough of this country.

None of our business

The BBC and other assorted leftists were up in arms at the use of chemical weapons in Syria the other day, seems cutting the hearts out of an unbeliever by their side is ok, but gassing the people they support isn't. We've even had the unedifying spectacle of George Galloway trying to implicate Israel for the incident. Naturally the attempt to try and involve the West because children were involved is now the clarion call of all those who in the past haven't wanted foreign intervention anywhere as it enhances imperialism.
BBC.

France has said a "reaction with force" could be needed if Syria is proved to have used chemical weapons against its own people.
The comments from Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius come as Syrian activists say hundreds of people were killed in such attacks in Damascus on Wednesday.
The UN has asked Syria to allow UN weapons inspectors already in country to be allowed to investigate.
There is no sign as yet that Damascus will allow this.

Even if the Syrian government are doing this, it's still none of our or even France's business and unless the Syrian government are trying to gas us, it never will be. That's not to say I haven't empathy for the victims, it's just that there are countries a hell of a lot closer who need to be involved in what is basically an islamic civil war first before my interest might be piqued. Even then it will probably be to build a big wall around the place and negotiate with the survivors.
Nor do I believe that there is any place in our society for any refugees either, we have a big enough islamic problem as it is and adding several thousand freedom fighters will not help.
No, Syria is not our problem, it's unlikely to ever be our problem, let the muslims sort it out for themselves...

A paltry sum

If a broadcaster invited along a guest speaker who told the viewers that it was ok to murder anyone who insulted someone else you'd expect that the broadcaster would face serious charges such as inciting violence, perhaps even being shut down...
Unless they are an islamic channel of course...
BBC.

The broadcasting watchdog Ofcom has fined an Islamic TV channel £85,000, for inciting violence.
It ruled in December that Noor TV had breached broadcasting codes after a host said it was acceptable or even the duty of a Muslim to murder anyone who disrespected the Prophet Mohammed.
Ofcom said the fine imposed today was so large due to the serious nature of the breaches.
But it stopped short of revoking the channel's licence.
Noor TV, which is owned by Al Ehya Digital Television, broadcasts both in the UK and internationally on Sky.
The programme in question, Paigham-e-Mustafa, was broadcast on 3 May 2012.
Presenter Allama Muhammad Farooq Nizami answered questions from viewers around the world about a wide range of issues relating to Islam.
One caller asked what the punishment was for anyone showing disrespect for Prophet Muhammad.
Nizami answered that "there is no disagreement about this. There is absolutely no doubt about it that the punishment for the person who shows disrespect for the Prophet is death."

It does occur to me that £85,000 is not a great amount, not in the broadcasting world anyway where revenues are quite high. It also occurs to me that any broadcaster that invites controversial speakers along should also make them very aware that anything they say that breaks the law will terminate the broadcast. Many radio shows use a one minute time delay to remove controversy particularly in talk shows where the unpredictability of the speakers needs a little added insurance.
The main problem is of course is what the islamoloon said was perfectly in sync with what muslims are expected to believe, despite our inbred politicians and associated leftards insisting that it's a religion of peace despite all evidence to the contrary.
So we have a sentence of death for anyone who disrespects a murdering, raping, child molesting, paedophilic, misogynistic, robbing, psychotic, lying, deluded, genocidal desert warlord who attached a false religion onto a war manual and set off to conquer the world.
It's difficult to see how the historical Mohammed can be insulted... unless the truth is seen as an insult...
Which to muslims, sadly it is.

Someone gets it...

I have a great deal of time for Lord Tebbit, even if I don't always agree with his politics, still he usually makes sense, even if his adherence to the Tory Party occasionally blindsides him to common sense.
Still, his views on the EDL will have caused some on the left to have a collective heart attack as he's challenged them to prove they are 'far right' as he believes that's a slur on the Tory party, who to my eyes aren't right anything these days, more centre/soft left.
Huffington Post.

The outspoken former Conservative minister Lord Tebbit has insisted there is no evidence the English Defence League is "far right", sparking new debate on the place of the anti-Muslim street group on the political spectrum.
Lord Tebbit has challenged the founder of an anti-Islamophobia monitoring group to prove the group adheres to far-right principles, and says calling the group "right-wing" is an attempt to smear mainstream conservatives.
The former Conservative Party chair took issue with the description of the EDL in an independent report produced by Teesside University on the Far Right and the promotion of anti-Muslim prejudice, commissioned by Tell MAMA.

That would be the same Tell MAMA who fibbed about an anti-muslim backlash after the barbarous murder of Lee Rigby in order to try and divert attention from the islamoloons who perpetrated the act. The self same Tell MAMA who have now had their government funding revoked.
Lord Tebbit wrote to the head of Tell MAMA...

"As you are unable to give me any justification for your claim that the EDL is an extreme right wing organisation other than that someone else said that it was."I have as you so kindly suggested 'taken time' to follow up the references you sent me.
"Sadly, I can find no reference in any of them to views which are extreme right wing unless one is under the illusion that all extreme nationalists or all anti-Islamists are by definition extreme right wing.
"I am left therefore with no option but to ask you what it is that you think are the extreme right wing politics of the EDL?"

All Tell MAMA could produce were a raft of media descriptions prefacing the term EDL with 'far right' without anyone being able to say why or indeed prove they are. Indeed, to many these days, the term 'far right' is simply a descriptor of anyone or any group the left don't like.
Of course there are always some who cannot get it into their heads that what the EDL do is perfectly legal and has been succesful in drawing attention to the danger of islamists in our midst.

Yup, the EDL fly foreign flags, have a Sikh division, many members who are not white English and have a very energetic Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual and Transgender division, all terribly multicultural and all opposed to islam which the author in the above picture can't quite grasp so he wants to ban them.
There is no evidence whatsoever that the EDL are 'far right' or indeed far anything, they are a reaction to a cancer in our midst. They are apolitical, by which I mean they won't tell you who to vote for and are open to anyone to join and support from all over the world.
That hardly fits the criteria for 'far right' now does it?

What the hell is wrong with these people?

Child abuse happens, we know this, there are safeguards in place to prevent it, both physical and sexual. That said, they aren't perfect and the system is only as good as those monitoring and enforcing it. However those who are employed as guardians in the social services at least need to know if there's a problem in the first place...
Islamweb.
Question

My husband has sexually assaulted our daughter of 14 years old. She says he came in her bedroom, lied down behind her, undress her undergarment and put his private part from behind to front. she is not sure if it was entered or not. he left it there a while and then went away. I have thrown him out the day I found out. He denies it but I don’t believe him. He says it is unintentional if it happened. Could I give him another chance? He says he realizes his faults now and that he was away from deen and zikr and it is very important to be focused with Islam If I look at whats happened I hate this man. but when I look at the 17 years we’ve spent together I feel emotionally shattered. Two people who have been told the situation say that in Islamic shariah we could no longer live as husband and wife after his action. I don;t event know if I can live with him anymore but would still like to rectify the situation. Please could you tell me is our nikah now haraam.
Solution
All perfect praise be to Allaah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allaah, and that Muhammad , is His slave and Messenger.
What this man did is a great, abominable and obnoxious sin. In addition to its being a great sin, it is contrary to the Fitrah and the natural predisposition of human beings as we have clarified in Fataawa 88782 and86063.
Dear Sister, what your husband did does not make you forbidden for him and it does not invalidate the marriage. However, you should conceal his sin and not disclose it to people, especially since he claims that he has repented and has become righteous, and that he even denies doing it.
Nevertheless, you should be careful of him and not leave any occasion for him to be in seclusion with your daughter lest he should do the same thing again as he cannot be trusted. Also, your daughter should observe Hijaab in front of him as long as it is feared that he would commit what is forbidden with her

Yep, that's right, take the pervert back as what he's done isn't grounds for divorce (or imprisonment) in the eyes of allah as he's sorry and he didn't do it anyway... though he clearly can't be trusted.
A truly amazing fatwa which essentially tell muslim wives to cover up their partners paedophilia. One wonders if this is why the paedophile rape gangs got away with their crimes for so long, the muslim women in the criminals lives kept silent, though there is evidence of police, social services and political collusion as well, as the state more or less fell over itself not to investigate to avoid being criticised for racism..
Unfortunately, shari'a requires 4(four) male witnesses to testify affirmatively for a rape conviction to occur - that is if the perpetrator did not confess.
This is virtually impossible. Muhammad himself was a big time rapist, and he made it halal for the ummah (global Muslim male dominated community) to excuse themselves such barbaric acts.
What chance do our social services have if a bloody online imam keeps telling the muslims to conceal their crimes?

The enemy within #2 or possibly #3

As a nation the English and indeed the British generally have pretty good sense and have an instinctive knowledge of right and wrong even if many choose to ignore such strictures. Yet sadly that good sense seems to constantly elude the political classes who have tried and in many cases succeeded in destroying many of those values with a torrent of unwanted mass uncontrolled immigration. What we are now discovering is a network or fifth column of undesirables using their residency here to destroy, corrupt or criminally abuse our society...
Mail.

Between 80 and 90 per cent of the world’s trade relies on sea transport, with half of that – billions of pounds’ worth – funnelled through the Gulf of Aden, that part of the Arabian Sea between Yemen and Somalia, through the Red Sea to the Suez Canal to Europe. It’s crucial for the transport of Persian Gulf oil.
And everything is fair game for the pirates, from 1,000ft-long oil tankers to tiny sailing boats with two people on board – as in the case of the Chandlers. They were seized in October 2009 and held for 388 days.
The huge scale of the problem makes it all the more remarkable that the hub of this trade in misery is London – the world’s centre of shipbroking and insurance.
The pirates’ moneymen and informers lie hidden among the city’s large but nearly invisible Somali population. Some 15,000 Somalis live in the borough of Tower Hamlets, and a further 5,000 in Hackney.

All invited in by bloody leftard New Labour because they thought they were buying votes, not trouble. The idiots even apologised for it, yet this is something which is unforgivable, it's divided societies and allowed an alien culture whose grasp of the basic tenets of civilisation and decency is severely limited to take root here.
It does boil the blood somewhat that there are 15,000 Somalis in Tower Hamlets and Hackney, it strikes me as about 15,000 too many, even if they are mostly law abiding as we don't have enough knowledge of which ones are or aren't.
Pretty much the same with any community who regard their laws and their religion to be above the laws of this land. It really ought to be quite simple, integrate or leave. Abide by our laws and don't try to change or ignore them or go.
Be good citizens or bye bye...

It's only money...

If at work I have out of pocket expenses, I claim these back from my employer, however what I consider an out of pocket expense does not seem to be the same thing as what a government employee (at the higher levels) considers due to them from their position...
Telegraph.

Britain's most senior civil servants are having part of their tax bills paid using public money in an arrangement that leaves them tens of thousands of pounds better off every year.
Whitehall departments are picking up the tax bills for perks such as official cars, first-class rail travel and rent-free accommodation. The arrangements, which were described by tax advisers as “highly unusual”, were made between government departments and the taxman as part of a deal agreed more than a decade ago. The effect of the deal is to increase the value of officials’ pay packages by up to £30,000 a year at the expense of taxpayers. Those who benefited from the scheme include Sir Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary; Sir David Nicholson, the head of NHS England; and Phillippa Williamson, the former head of the Serious Fraud Office. Richard Bacon, a Conservative member of the public accounts committee, said he was “concerned” that officials are being given tax-free benefits while members of the public have to pay the taxman for theirs.

Ok, rail travel, you get a second class ticket, you want first class, the cost of upgrading comes from your pocket, not mine.
Rent free accommodation?  No how, no way, you get the equivalent of a decent hotel if you're away from home on business, you want better, you pay for an upgrade yourself. You do not live rent free at my expense.
You want a car? You pay for it as I did with a company car through taxation, you don't drive around free at my expense.
The problem is that senior civil servants believe they have an entitlement to the things that the head of a private corporate head has, whilst forgetting that the corporate head derives his perks from the companies profits. I have yet to discover a government dept that makes money, rather than one who constantly bleats for more money from my pockets.
There really ought to be a crackdown on 'perks' at the higher levels, they get paid enough as it is and often move onto nice little well paid sinecures when they do eventually move on.
Problem there is that those chosen to do such a cull are part of the system itself so it all becomes self defeating.
Perhaps we should simply sack the lot of them and begin from scratch.

Unenforceable

The government it seems wishing to curry favour with motorists (whilst taxing them to penury) have turned their attention to clockers... (Centre Lane Owners Club) and the maddening driving skills of some people who deem it their god given right to get into a lane on a motorway, drive at ten miles less than the speed limit (at least) and refuse to move out of that lane come hell or high water with a line of traffic tailgating behind them.
Sounds good in theory... in practice, well lets just say that this has the possibility of getting right up a lot of motorists noses.
Telegraph.

New on-the-spot penalties for motorists who hog the middle lane, cut up other drivers or tailgate will be unenforceable with the current numbers of traffic officers, police have warned.
From today, drivers face a £100 fine for these offences as part of a package that will also see people get three points on their licence for careless driving. The fine for using a hand-held mobile while driving will increase to £100 as well.
But the Police Federation suggested the initiative by the Department for Transport (DfT) had failed to take account of the cuts to the policing budget rolled out by the Home Office. Steve White, vice-chairman of the policing body, said: “It’s all very well for the DfT to come up with these new ideas when the Home Office are at the same time cutting the number of police around the country, which means a fall in the number of traffic police.

What they are saying is basically true, at the moment once you spot a traffic cop, you know once you're out of their way you're pretty much clear till the next county. If anything like speed cameras the traffic cops themselves often cause traffic on spotting them to bunch as people slow down to check their speed, even if they are within the law.
Among the offences police are expected to focus on are:
• Driving too close to the vehicle in front
• Failing to give way at a junction (not requiring evasive action by another driver)
• Overtaking and pushing into a queue of traffic
• Being in the wrong lane and pushing into a queue on a roundabout
• Lane discipline, such as needlessly hogging the middle or outside lanes
• Inappropriate speed
• Wheel-spins, handbrake turns and other careless manoeuvres
 All of which actually require a police officer to witness said activities and as I've pointed out above, the likelihood of that is pretty low.
In other words it's bad law as it's pretty unenforceable outside the view of a policeman and is unlikely to be policed by consent as such activities as theft, violence etc where the public can and do report such matters.
Just another revenue raising activity at best...

And we'll do what?

In May of this year I visited Egypt, I did a Nile cruise, a visit to Cairo and then a few days on the Red Sea. It was a damned good holiday, but it was obvious from my conversations with out tour guides that Egypt was a country with problems. All the tour guides were fairly convinced that there would be another revolution in the country after the overthrow of Ex president Mubarack. The reasons cited were that there were now fuel shortages, power outages and food shortages, seem that President Morsi and his merry band of Muslim Brotherhood supporters were if anything more corrupt than the previous administration. Added to this religious intolerance and economic lunacy then the armies crackdown was probably inevitable.
BBC.

Egypt's ambassador to London has been warned of Britain's "deep concern" over a bloody crackdown on supporters of former president Mohammed Morsi.
Ashraf El Kholy was summoned to the Foreign Office for a meeting at which a senior official "condemned the use of force" to clear two protest camps.
A state of emergency was declared in Cairo after the violence.
The city is reported to be quiet but tense after the crackdown, which left hundreds dead.
Egypt's interim government has been the subject of worldwide condemnation after the clashes.
The official death toll has risen to 525 but leaders of Mr Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood claim that far more were killed in what they describe as a "massacre" on the streets of the capital.

Well there goes the Arab Spring.
50% of Egyptians who have the franchise and are able to vote are illiterate, they make up the bulk of the surprisingly well armed Muslim Brotherhood having been told by the various imam's in the mosques to vote for and support the brotherhood. These are the self same imam's who under Mubarack were kept under observation and subject to imprrisonment for preaching hate. Mubarack knew Egypt's life blood was tourism, hence he dealt ruthlessly with those who got in the way of it. Morsi reversed all this.
So, we summon the Egyptian ambassador to what is colloquially known as the camel corp headquarters to tell him we're deeply concerned. Wow I bet he's quaking in his boots, I mean other than a stiff talking too, what else can we do?
The army aren't the problem here, the problem is the muslim brotherhood whose supporters have destroyed and attacked churches all over Egypt

Churches
Alexandria
1. Father Maximus Church
Arish
1. St George Church | Burned |
Assiut
1. Good Shepherds Monastery | Nuns attacked
2. Angel Michael Church | Surrounded
3. St George Coptic Orthodox Church |

4. Al-Eslah Church| Burned |
5. Adventist Church | Pastor and his wife kidnapped |
6. St Therese Church |
7. Apostles Church | Burning |
8. Holy Revival Church | Burning |
Beni Suef
1. The Nuns School |
2. St George Church | al-Wasta
Cairo
1. St Fatima Basilica | Heliopolis | Attempted Attack
Fayoum (Five churches)
1. St Mary Church | El Nazlah |
2. St Damiana Church | Robbed and burned
3. Amir Tawadros (St Theodore) Church
4. Evangelical Church | al-Zorby Village | Looting and destruction
5. Church of Joseph | Burned |
6. Franciscan School | Burned |
Gharbiya
1. Diocese of St Paul | Burned |
Giza
1. Father Antonios
2. Atfeeh Bishopric
Minya (Around twelve churches)
1. Church of the Virgin Mary and Father Abram | Delga, Deir Mawas |
2. St Mina Church | Abu Hilal Kebly, Beni Hilal |
3. Baptist Church | Beni Mazar |
4. Deir Mawas Bishopric
5. Delga Church | Attacked (Previously attacked with fire)
6. The Jesuit Fathers Church | Abu Hilal district
7. St Mark Church | Abu Hilal district
8. St Joseph Nunnery |
9. Amir Tadros Church |
10. Evangelical Church |
11. Anba Moussa al-Aswad Church
12. Apostles Church |
Qena
1. St Mary’s Church | Attempted Burning
Sohag
1. St George Church |
2. St Damiana | Attacked and burned |
3. Virgin Mary | Attacked and burned |
4. St Mark Church & Community Center
5. Anba Abram Church | Destroyed and burned |
Suez
1. St Saviours Anglican Church |
2. Franciscan Church and School | Street 23 | Bu rned |
3. Holy Shepherd Monastery and Hospital |
4. Good Shepherd Church (molotov cocktail thrown)- Relationship with Holy Shepherd Monastery unknown.
5. Greek Orthodox Church |

To continue reading further go to:

www.jihadwatch.org/2013/08/muslim-brothe...-all-over-egypt.html

Yet we're concerned...
We really need to get our priorities right and be supporting the Egyptian army.
But no, we won't, we'll support the barbarians... As usual.

Are they sure they've got the right woman?

Seems some people have been arrested over mocking the death of  Lee Rigby. No surprises that they are muslims of course. The names are surprising though...
Express.

A WOMAN has appeared in court today accused of making videos mocking the brutal murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby in Woolwich.

Rebekah Dawson, 21, has been charged with allegedly recording a clip showing a man driving past the memorial for the soldier and laughing about the death.
Dawson, who appeared briefly at Westminster Magistrates Court, is accused of dissemination of terrorist publications and encouragement of terrorism.
She has been jointly charged with Royal Barnes, 22, who appeared at the same court on Monday to face terror charges.

As you can see from the picture, the woman could be anyone, oh I'm sure they have the right one, but unless she removes the head piece, how will anyone know. There's also the possibility of being unable to see her features might influence any decision on her, whether for good or bad, who knows.
Not that I'm advocating a ban the burka campaign, just pointing out that it makes a pretty good disguise...
Unfortunately because the MSM are a bit wary of reporting on muslims, we don't actually know if she unveiled in the court. I suspect she did, but have no proof of this. If she didn't well that's a serious error of judgement by the judges themselves.
Still it is interesting to see muslims being dealt with in a similar manner to the likes of the ordinary people for promoting hatred, though having had the occasional trawl through youtubes hate video's, I'm pretty sure that had not Lee Rigby's death been so prominent, they probably would as many of the barbarians have, gotten away with it.

So how's that going to work then?

Imagine you're a young teen, or even younger and you suddenly have unlimited access to the sweetie jar that is the internet either because your parents don't give a damn, or that you know how the home computer works far better than they do. Suddenly you're faced with a decision...
A little notification comes up asking to know if you're old enough to watch this content...
Decisions, decisions eh?
Telegraph.

Ministers want parents and teenagers themselves to be able to assign age-ratings to videos and other content which has been uploaded by internet users onto websites.
The government is working with internet service companies and media regulators to test how “crowd sourcing” such age ratings can work, The Telegraph has learnt.
The move follows concerns over the widespread availability of legal pornography and violent videos which ministers believe are corrupting children’s minds.
David Cameron said last month that he feared for his own children’s exposure to inappropriate material on the internet and lamented the lack of “rules” on age controls that apply to websites.

Cameron by name Camoron by nature. How the fucking hell (pardon my French) is any website going to know how old the people are watching their content? God alone knows I get nearly a thousand lookin's a day (most I suspect are spammers or googlebots) and to be honest I haven't a clue as to who they are, or indeed who you are looking at this.
What you'll get is a little notification pops up saying you must be over (pick an age) to view this content. Then a little button saying 'I'm over' and a button saying 'I'm under' followed by a quick check to see if mum's dozing on the sofa then clickety click no doubt.
Either that or government tries to get people to opt in to self censorship (ha ha) or forces us to opt in and so has statistics on everyone opting in. Anyone here feeling any levels of trust as to those statistics staying private? Perhaps one day it will come to a trial and the prosecution will wave a sheet of paper from your ISP proving you're a pervert, it's called mission creep and what a government of today says is not binding on the government of tomorrow.
Why won't they leave us alone and simply get on with running the country rather than trying to run our lives?

The bollocks they speak...

Is it some sort of regulation that states that anyone who becomes a politician has to have their brains removed and talk utter bollocks about subjects they know nothing of  including the art of never answering a question directly?
Express.

WAVES of migrants will be forced to flee their homes and seek refuge in other countries due to extreme climate change, a top Labour MP warned today.

Is he talking about a new ice age?
Ok that was a bit silly.

Shadow immigration minister Chris Bryant said millions of people in India, China and other parts of Asia are particularly vulnerable to coastal flooding.
And he urged policy makers to concentrate efforts on providing safety nets for 'environmental refugees'.
He said: "If we get climate change wrong there is a very real danger we shall see levels of mass migration as yet unparalleled."
He made his comments in a speech to the centre-left IPPR think tank in London in which he called on Labour to maintain its commitment to international development.
While most commentary focuses on economic 'pull factors' that draw migrants to other countries, Mr Bryant said it was important to also examine 'push factors'.

Daft thing is, even the U,N. has been forced to admit that there has been little or no temperature increases over the last ten years. So where the idiot Bryant is getting his facts from is anyone's guess though I suspect the lunatics at Greenpeace or Friends of the Earth.
Of course it could be simply another excuse by Labour to justify its ruinous immigration policies that have caused such division in the UK over recent years.
The real danger is that we are entering a cooling period that may last 200 to 250 years, in other words, another little ice age. Labour and the enviroloons don't of course want to hear of this as they are determined to destroy this country one way or another, but not by covering it in ice. They want windfarms producing expensive energy, they want population decline and in the case of Labour they want population decline of the English alone, replaced by their Labour voting immigrant pets.
Bryant may or may not know the truth, as a politician the probability is that he doesn't and is as ever decades behind the general public in his views of what they deem important. He's the sort of guy who would make King Canute pause for thought when presenting a fallacy of judgement, with the same end result of being unable to influence nature for exactly the same reasons.
Climate change is real, it just isn't changing the way that labour or the enviroloons want.

This is why we should not be giving foreign aid

It should not be up to the taxpayer to support humanitarian aid abroad unless they choose to give personally. Most of the aid goes where it shouldn't and either lines the pockets of kleptocracies or is seized by militants to keep wars going for far longer than they need to. There is strong evidence that the 'Live Aid' cash and supplies did exactly that in Ethiopia and led to dependency on foreign aid rather than looking out for themselves as the Ethiopian army and the rebels both seized supplies and kept the 'poor' starving and requesting aid.
BBC.

Humanitarian aid supplies worth £480,000 - funded by UK taxpayers - were seized by al-Qaeda-linked militants in Somalia, it has emerged.
Supplies were in warehouses captured in a raid by al-Shabab in November 2011, the Department for International Development's (DfID) accounts reveal.
DfID would not specify what those supplies included. It said all material was destroyed in the raid or later.
A DfID spokesman said working in "fragile states carries inherent risk".
The department's annual accounts said the £480,000 was written off "following the theft between November 2011 and February 2012, by al-Shabab in southern Somalia, of DfID-funded humanitarian materials and supplies from the offices and warehouses of partner organisations, to which DfID had provided funding to deliver projects and programmes".
The accounts said DfID's partners had "no prior warning of the confiscations being carried out and therefore had no time to prevent the loss by relocating goods".

Completely missing the point that had we not sent aid, the islamics wouldn't have been able to seize the aid.
It's not just the UK taxpayer of course, it's pretty much any charity which involves itself abroad where much of what is given is wasted, stolen, misused or just the wrong stuff. A lot of charities have done well for themselves by doing good, nice plush offices in London and well heeled officials drawing their wages from the generosity of others. That's not to say I don't admire those at the sharp end, though as those two young ladies attacked by islamobarbarians in Zanzibar found out, volunteering has its own attendant risks too.
I'm sick and tired of the government taking our cash to give to those abroad, charity begins at home and we have enough problems here. If it's a bribe to get foreign governments to buy our stuff, then fine, say so and let's be done with it. But stop the aid, it's not getting in anything like the quantities needed to those in real need, if anything its only prolonging their agony by feeding or funding their oppressors.

Another joy of multiculturalism

The left and the powers that be love multiculturalism. The left because it devalues the values and aspirations of the indigenous population and rubs the 'rights' nose in the differing cultures being allowed to settle here without integration. The powers that be love it because of cheap labour and a desperate need to give the public an 'enemy' and to keep paying the ever increasing tax needed to keep their various ponzi schemes going.
BBC.

Teachers, doctors and airport staff need to be alert to the problem of forced marriages over the school holidays, the government has warned.
Ministers said there were concerns about teenagers being taken abroad thinking they were going on holiday but being forced into marriage instead.
Figures suggest cases are particularly common during the summer break.
The government's Forced Marriage Unit received 400 reports between June and August last year.
Recent estimates suggest more than 5,000 people from the UK are forced into marriage every year.
More than a third of those affected are aged under 16.

Yes another joy of multiculturalism prevalent to the Indian sub-continent (mostly) and more to do with bringing in close cousins to share the generosity of this country and add to our health taxes by the genetic problems that close cousin marriages bring.
Naturally we are talking muslims here, though they aren't the only ones doing it, just the majority of it. This group are also the degenerates who believe the preying on and grooming of young white women is perfectly acceptable as they aren't muslim, Pakistani, nor members of the tribe hence simply worthless meat for entertainment.
And yet when people decide to talk about this, to protest about this, guess who the bigoted racists are?
That's right, it's anyone but the actual perpetrators of the problem.
Don't you just love the hypocrisy of it all?

Wrong place at the wrong time...

The two ladies from North London who went to the barbaric islamic island of Zanzibar have finally returned to the UK. Apparently the Zanzibarian authorities have questioned some people and came out with the title of the blog post.
BBC.

Two British women who had acid thrown in their faces in Zanzibar have arrived back in the UK.
Kirstie Trup and Katie Gee, both 18 and from north London, landed at RAF Northolt at about 13:45 and went by ambulance to hospital in west London.
Zanzibar police have offered a £4,000 reward for information leading to capture of the suspects.
A police commissioner told the BBC several people were being questioned but a motive had not been established.
The BBC's Tulanana Bohela, in Dar es Salaam, said Islam is the main religion on Zanzibar and in more remote parts of the island, away from tourist beaches, there are signs asking foreigners to respect the local culture and cover up - in case skimpy outfits upset villagers.

Now I'm all for being careful about observing local customs when abroad, my good Lady and I kept covered up when we visited Egypt, though we did get tutted at in the airport for holding hands by some old biddy. However it's becoming plainly obvious that a certain stripe of muslim believes they can inflict their view upon anyone muslim or not in the most barbaric manner possible. One of the girls had previously been slapped for singing during ramadama ding dong, by some islamofreak, despite it not being the girls religion. They were even covered up when the to barbarians on the motorcycle sprayed them with battery acid, so they were following the rules.
But rules don't count for anyone in an islamic area who isn't a muslim of a certain stripe, or female, or Jewish or Christian, because to muslims of a certain stripe we are the problem simply by being. That makes us fair game for bombs, bullets, acid and any other means of jihad.
I do believe that eventually muslims of a certain stripe will push us all to far and we'll deal with them and (probably unfortunately) a lot of other muslims who simply want to get by permanently and with extreme prejudice. Why? Because they are acting more and more like Nazi's every day and people will only tolerate so much islamic supremacism before snapping.
The day is coming when ordinary muslims will bitterly regret the actions of the fanatics acting in their name, mark my words.

Utter bollocks

There's a blog post in the Telegraph from Tim Stanley who appears to believe that islam is way more English than the EDL.
Telegraph.

Whither the articulate nutters? Yesterday I got into a Twitter spat with the EDL's Tommy Robinson (isn't Twitter fun? Please don't ban it, Caitlin) and I'm not very impressed. He was angry with a piece I wrote about him linking to an anti-Semitic website, and this cued an evening of tweets accusing me of not understanding the plight of Luton and how I obviously hate the English working class. It's all predictable stuff, but the latter point does interest me. I've often suspected that the EDL's grip on the popular imagination comes from its claim to represent what remains of the native proletariat – and a lot of middle class folks in the media think that maybe they do, which is why they invite Tommy onto TV shows to share his toilet wall history of Islam with the nation. But they're wrong. The EDL's definition of what constitutes the English working class is a classic case of projection.
By contrast, most Muslims cling on to values that were once definitively English and that we could do with rediscovering. Islam instructs its followers to cherish their families, to venerate women, to treat strangers kindly, to obey the law of any country they are in (yes, yes, it really does), and to give generously. One recent poll found that British Muslims donate more money to charity than any other religious group.

Strangely enough I'll bet there are a few of us who have linked to sites that we later wished we hadn't or failed to read the full post. This however does not make Tommy an anti-semite, merely mistaken.
As for the rest...
Islam cherishes family, which is why their men groom young white women because they aren't family or muslims.
Islam tells its followers to venerate women whilst allowing them to beat the crap out of them and the males deciding such matters as contraception, stonings, divorce proceedings etc. all cultural, all islamic all barbaric.
As for giving generously, well they do, do zakat, but they only give to muslim charities and perpetuate poverty in islamic shitholes because the poor have no incentive to better themselves.

Of course, I'll be labelled a snob for writing all of this. So, to reassure the critics, I rang up my father – the most working class Englishman I know – and asked him what he thought of the EDL. "Idiots", he said.

I rather think the father is an idiot, left wing (classes as the same) or has never run into islam or seen its effect on a society which much of the EDL have.
I don't even think Stanley's a snob, I think he's pig ignorant of the devastating effect that islam has had on working class communities. I think he has the wishy washy golden view of islam as held by the NUJ and the left.
I think he's ignored that 12% of the prison population are muslims against 4% of the population.
I think he's choosing to ignore the grooming scandal by muslims sweeping the country.
I think he's ignoring the shariah zones and gay bashing going on in places like tower hamlets.
I think he's ignored Charity walkers being abused in 'muslim areas'

'They told us that they hated dogs and told us to get out of the car park. The children were petrified and asked why these people were calling me a s***'

Victoria Ellis, 36, wife of Steven Ellis

All terribly English? No?

All in all I think Tim Stanley is possibly the most ignorant man on the planet with regard to his views about the EDL.
No wonder comments on his blog piece are closed.

Stirring up tensions?

You have to wonder at the sheer hypocrisy of those who have a problem with the current Home Office campaign against illegal immigrants. After all, you'd suspect that the term illegal rather gives the game away.
Still, you cannot expect the hard of thinking aka the left and its bed chum the race industry to apply common sense to a genuine problem, as far as they are concerned the campaign is racist because it targets foreigners...
BBC.

Vans with the slogan "Stirring up tension and division in the UK illegally? Home Office, think again" have been driven around London by civil rights campaign group Liberty.
The organisation is using the vans in opposition to the government's "go home" immigration campaign vans.
The Home Office adverts said: "Go home, or you'll be picked up and deported".
The government said its campaign was "another part of the reforms...that have seen net migration drop".

Now whilst Liberty is a little bit more user friendly to right wing thinking (marginally) its roots are definitely left leaning and only really interested in left-wing freedoms and rubbish about human rights, the human rights of the criminal classes that is. And as the Labour peer Lord Lipsey has reported the ads to the Advertising Standards Authority, and the union Unite has said the government's campaign was "vile" and it was seeking legal advice, you can guess just how effective the campaign is...
The left love immigration, illegal or not because the majority of immigrants will vote for the left wing lunacy of the state giving them more dosh from the hard working, it's a similar case with the left and the benefits class, though they do struggle to get them to vote as opposed to the block postal votes of certain immigrant groups.
The left as ever keep forgetting who has to pay for these illegals and that is the working classes whose jobs are threatened by cheap uncompetitive labour, it's the tax payer who also have to pay for the inevitable legal costs when the illegals are caught and start to play the system as well.
Human rights are a good thing, don't get me wrong, however as with many things they get abused and used in ways they were never meant to be used for, or are so badly written that they are abused by the lawyers to exploit the system to pay them to defend the indefensible.
Still, I'm sure the government are just loving all these loony lefty organisations helping them fool the public into believing they are serious about clamping down on illegal immigration. There are estimated to be around 400,000 criminal entrants living in the London area alone, how many of them have they captured so far? About 120 of them and I suspect and they'll let most of them go in the end if they haven't done so already. But because of all this fuss and general nonsense you are supposed to think they are doing something effective. It's their insult to our intelligence once more which angers the most.
Damned if we do and damned if we don't.

I have to admit I always feel brilliant after one

Orgasms are in the news because scientists reckon they are better for our brains than doing a crossword or sudoku. I do have to wonder where to get on the test subject list for this kind of research though, hell I don't (crossed fingers) even get telemarketers.
Telegraph.

The sexual climax gives the whole brain a good workout, rather than just one area of it, Professor Barry Komisaruk said.
The sensation can, moreover, block pain and could therefore be used to alleviate the agony of childbirth, among other things, he suggested.
Depression, anxiety and addiction could also benefit if scientists can harness the pleasure-producing mechanism in the brain that produces orgasm and put it to other uses, he believes.
The 72-year-old US researcher has been studying female sexual pleasure since the 1960s, beginning his experiments on rats before moving on to women in 1982.
His decades of devotion to a subject that has scandalised some of his fellow academics at Rutgers University in New Jersey has made him something of an evangelist about the power and benefits of the sexual climax.

Dammit, why is this research always elsewhere?
I have to admit his conjecture about increased oxygenation does have a basis for credibility, after all that's how a supercharger works and a supercharged brain does strike me as one that is working at peak.
That said, the more intellectual thoughts that humans have aren't really flitting through the brain during coitus... well not unless it's an attempt by the male to delay said orgasm.
I rather suspect it's feelings and emotions that are heightened during the act, rather than logical thought and analysis, though possibly great discoveries and serendipitous breakthroughs can be made whilst screaming out yes, yes, yes!
Of course there's always that meme going around that a pig orgasms for 30 mins (not strictly true)
Might just mean they are smart enough not to want to run the planet.

Legal reasons...

A 12 year old girl was raped in Walthamstow a couple of days ago, the BBC are naturally being rather coy about the identities of those now arrested for this dreadful barbaric crime. In a classic MONA* (Julia's famous Men Of No Appearance) moment the BBC have declined to describe or name those arrested for legal reasons. Not that you have to dig very far to come up with a few more details...
BBC.

A third teenager has been arrested over the rape of a 12-year-old girl in east London.
The Metropolitan Police said the 17-year-old was arrested after going to a police station.
The girl was attacked at about 00:15 BST on 27 July at a row of garages in Walthamstow after talking to three people
Two other 17-year-old boys have been charged with rape and are due at Snaresbrook Crown Court on 21 August.
One boy was remanded on custody and the other has been released on conditional bail.
They cannot be named for legal reasons.

Ok, I understand the reasons for needing to protect the girl, but 17 year old males hardly need anonymity, except if they fir the profile for a certain religion or their skin colour isn't the norm for those being newsworthy by the BBC.
Still the Independent has a few more details...
Independent.

The attackers were said to be aged between 17 and 19.
The first was dark-skinned and of mixed race, with a diamond stud in his left ear and a London accent. He told the girl his name was Mo and that he was 17.
He had big brown eyes, short hair, was very skinny and wore a black puffa-style jacket with a hood, black chinos, black trainers and a grey/black T-shirt.
The second was black and very tall with big lips. His hair was partly shaven and he wore black trousers and a red and blue shirt.
The third, who did not rape the girl, was black and had a moustache. He wore a blue-coloured hooded top and a red and blue cap, and told her his name was Miles.

Well, shock, horror... None of them are indigenous whitey's and one can't help but wonder assuming the details are correct if Mo, is short for Mohammed? I mean it could be Maurice I suppose, but considering the description and the style of attack it does seem to fit the profile of a follower of the Pedo-Prophet.
Still, I might be wrong, though certainly not about the BBC and the powers that be not wanting the identity of the attackers becoming widespread and alerting the general populace over the barbarians in our midst.

The race industry

It's pretty much a truism for any government funded department or government funded cause in that once the money flows in, they feel obliged to justify said money to keep flowing in. With the Equality and Human Rights Commission their remit is to combat racism, this means in order to justify their suckling at the taxpayers teat they have to find racism... any racism even if it's not really racism at all.
Express.

BRITAIN’S equalities watchdog was accused of ­creating a farce yesterday after it demanded the Home Office prove that a controversial anti-illegal immigrant programme was not racist.
Immigration officers and police carried out a series of stop-and-check operations around London railway stations this week.
This led to the arrest of more than a dozen suspected illegal immigrants.
The Home Office said their operations were “based on intelligence”.
But the Equality and Human Rights Commission launched an inquiry yesterday to see if it breached discrimination rules by using “racial profiling”.
The Commission will also be examining a controversial “Go home or face arrest” advertising campaign set up by the Home Office.

You'd think that the Commission would realise that the immigrants were targeted because they are here illegally and any illegal immigrants would be foreigners by definition, or is that implying common sense to the race industry?
The thing is, illegals don't pay tax, don't pay national insurance and whilst they may contribute economically to the system, as a net benefit they often undermine those who do employ legal immigrants and follow the rules and regulation. These are the companies who are often 'undercut' by those abusing the system.
So, from my point of view it isn't racism to profile those in the possible illegals group, though try convincing a leftard or human rights for anyone but the English supporter of this. As far as they are concerned we should be offering the thieves an amnesty. And yes, they are thieves as they are taking something from those here who do contribute their fair whack.
They are illegals, they are criminals if only because they are illegals, they are foreigners by definition, what's so hard to grasp about this?

Another day, another muslim rape gang...

Despite the leftards desperate last ditch efforts to remove any evidence of any muslim crime links, yet another grooming case has come to the courts. All good British names of course, depending on your definition of British. No doubt this will be another case of misrepresenting the religion of barbarism and the guys perpetrating the abuse will not be 'real' muslims, despite growing evidence that this sort of case is a muslim of Pakistan/Bangladesh speciality.
Express.

A group of men accused of sexually exploiting teenage girls have been charged with a range of offences including rape, sexual assault and trafficking.
West Midlands Police said 10 suspects aged between 19 and 30 were charged following an inquiry into the alleged abuse of girls at various locations across Coventry.
The charges relate to the alleged exploitation of five teenagers between May and September last year.
Brothers Gulfraz Banaris, 20, Ifaraz Banaris, 25, from Deedmore Road, Wood End, Coventry, and Izthkhab Banaris, 24, from Eld Road, Coventry, are charged with conspiracy to traffic girls across the city for the purposes of sexual exploitation. Gulfraz and Izthkhab are also both accused of a rape.
A police spokesman said all three men appeared before magistrates in Coventry on Thursday and were remanded in custody to face Coventry Crown Court on November 7.
Brothers Isa Iqbal, 21, Ismail Iqbal, 20, both of no fixed address and cousins of the Banaris brothers, also face trafficking counts and are due to reappear in court in November.
Meanwhile, five other men are due to appear in court in Coventry on Friday in connection with the inquiry.
Ricardo Hinkson, 23, from Telfer Road, Radford, Coventry, has been charged with conspiracy to traffic within the UK for the purposes of sexual exploitation. Amir Mahmood, 27, a sign writer from Blackwell Road, Foleshill, Coventry, and milkman Tasveer Hussain, 30, of Canal Road, Foleshill, are also accused of the same offence.

Why do I have the suspicion that Ricardo Hinkson will somehow be used as evidence that the crimes the accused are being charged with is not a muslim only activity, despite the rest of them all being good muslim names (for a given value of good)
There are a couple of others accused as well, Saleem Hussain and Khezer Hussain so out of 10 suspects, 9 are of muslim extraction and one has a forename of Ricardo. Anyone going to take a flying leap of judgement which one will be used to try to disprove the suspicion that grooming gangs are an islamic speciality?
Yet still we will have our idiot politicians telling us that 'we're' the problem, that 'we' don't understand, that 'we're' intolerant. That ol whitey is just a racist, intolerant, fascist bigot and that these girls were asking for it. A page taken directly from the Jo Brand/SWP/UAF hymn sheet.
Yet the thing you won't read here is just how many cases are now coming through the system, nor just how many other similar cases are being investigated. You have to visit some dodgy anti-islamic sites for those sort of figures which naturally makes you a racist, despite islam nor muslims being a race.
For the record (avert your eyes if you have no desire to be racist) There have been 47 trials so far, all predominately muslim groomers. There are currently 129 cases still under investigation, all predominantly muslim groomers and there are another 15 trials about to happen... yes you guessed it, all predominantly muslim groomers.
Yet we're told constantly there isn't a problem with islam or muslims...

Reinstated, but for how long

There was an interesting article in the Telegraph today as highlighted by DerekP in the comments of my last post. It is by Sean Thomas and it highlights the abuse of wikipedia by its left leaning editors to remove articles mentioning the butchery of whites in the UK by non-whites. He reckons it's to try and deny the so called 'far right' helpful publicity.

Telegraph.

There are few people who would decry the peerage announced today for Doreen Lawrence, mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence. With her remorseless, dignified campaigning she made it impossible for British society to ignore the appalling slaughter of her son.

Actually I can as I believe Doreen Lawrence has warped British justice with her endless campaign to the point of emasculating our police and allowing the left led race industry a big stick in which to abuse the so called racist whites in UK society by the can't be racist no how, no way non whites. That she has been rewarded does not mean what she did was right or proper.

But here’s a funny thing. As I was looking at Wikipedia’s Lawrence entry, I tried to compare it to Wikipedia’s treatment of other “racialised” killings. Like that of white 19-year-old Gavin Hopley.
Ten years ago, Gavin Hopley, who worked as a security guard in Oldham, was hoping to get a late-night taxi with two friends. They approached a number of cars, in the Muslim area of Glodwick, which had seen serious racial tension in preceding months.
Suddenly they were surrounded by at least a dozen Asian youths, armed with lumps of wood. After a vicious scuffle, where he was kicked in the face, and clubbed with fence-posts, Gavin was left unconscious in the road. His friends escaped. A few days later Gavin died from his injuries.

Murdered by muslims, not Asians.

There was, in the past, a Wiki article on his case, but it isn’t there, not any more. However, the Wikipedian debate surrounding the removal of the Wiki article can still be seen.

Deliberately removed as it was being used by those who oppose the islamisation of the UK as evidence of the barbarians in our midst. The left will rewrite history deliberately to blot out such incidents as honesty is not in their remit.

To add to the intrigue, the same fastidious editors who deleted “Gavin Hopley” also removed entries relating to several other savage murders of whites by non-whites: Richard Whelan, Mary Ann Leneghan, Charlene Downes, etc. Here are some of the Wikipedia comments on those deletions: “Sad to say, murder is far too common to confer notability on its victims”; “We really don’t want articles on every single crime”.

Yet the murder of St Stephen of Lawrence is...

So what’s going on? Is there some vast, anti-white conspiracy at work in the Wikipedia labs? I doubt it. I suspect this is more a case of people hating the Far Right so much, they will redraft history, in order to deny them “helpful” publicity.

Pretty much spot on, the left will do anything to deny those whom they oppose a voice, in fact the term 'far right' is simply a label for anyone or anything the left doesn't like, same with fascist and bigot.
Oddly enough Wikipedia was shamed into restoring the Charlene Downes page by this article, though sadly not the others.
The left constantly deny those they oppose any form of fairness or justice if they can by any way prevent it. It's what they do, they are morally bankrupt and corrupt to the core.
Socialism like Nazism its brother in arms should have been consigned to the dustbin of history decades ago.