Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Not nearly enough

Can you imagine what sentence you'd get if you went on a twenty minute racist rant at a sports referee during a match? Particularly if you are already in breach of a 32 weeks suspended prison term for assault.
You'd expect the book thrown at you, you'd expect like Emma West to be caught up in the system for over a year whilst every inch of your private life is gone over with a fine toothed comb.
Well you'd expect that if you were English at least...
Mail.
An Asian footballer who racially abused a referee and threatened to kill his family after he was sent off during a match has been jailed for his 20-minute rant.
Wasar Ahmed, 23, launched a foul-mouthed racist tirade against Ian Fraser after he gave him a red card warning the official: 'I’m going to break every white bone in your white face.'
As the other players and spectators looked on, angry Ahmed was escorted off the field shouting: 'I’m going to burn your white house down and kill your wife and kids - I know where you live. I’m going to come and find your house.'
After the game finished, Ahmed stood near to Mr Fraser’s car and stared at him as he got in.
He was arrested soon after when the referee, who has 30 years' experience in officiating at matches, went to a police station and made a formal complaint to officers and the East Lancashire Football League.
At Burnley Crown Court, jobless Ahmed, from Burnley, admitted causing racially aggravated harassment, alarm or distress and was jailed for eight weeks after a judge said referees were entitled to protection from badly behaved footballers.
Ahmed later said he could not remember exactly what he said but admitted he had lost his temper.
It was also revealed he was in breach of a 32 weeks suspended prison term for assault.
Yep, 8 weeks which essentially means he'll be out and about in three, if he isn't out already.
There's also the 'Asian' thing again, though the name is a giveaway as Wasar Ahmed is a muslim of Pakistani descent.
Does anyone here believe that if a white person had done the same he'd have received the same kid glove treatment? I suppose it's possible, though judging from what has happened to racists who are white it does seem unlikely. Emma West for example got a 24 month community order, granted no prison, but she's still dealing with it.
Also of note is the guy with the bomb tattoo at the EDL demo was arrested and seems likely to be charged with “inciting religious or racial hatred” which if he's found guilty of will mean jail.
It will be interesting to see what sentence he gets as all he had was a picture... hell the poppy burners only got a £50 fine...

 

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Sanctuary for monsters

There are some people out there who are in love with the Human Rights Act, they are usually lawyers, criminals or the left hard of thinking. What they have for the lawyers is a nice little sinecure making them millions off the backs of people we usually don't want here (the criminals) whilst being cheered on by the left hard of thinking because in some twisted way they see it as some sort of blueprint to bring down western civilisation and usher in the inevitable revolution despite evidence in all cases that socialism simply doesn't work... bit like a lot of socialists.
Telegraph.
More than 800 people suspected of links to atrocities overseas have been identified since 2005 trying to secure shelter or settlement in this country.
Even though most have had their applications to stay rejected it is feared the majority are still here because human rights laws means it is unsafe to return them because they could face ill treatment.
Since January 2012 alone, immigration staff have made “adverse recommendations” in 115 cases of suspected war criminals, of which 99 were already in the UK.
Of those, just three have been deported.
The figure is in addition to the 702 suspected wear criminals identified either living in the UK or trying to enter the country between 2005 and 2012.
It has fuelled concerns that Britain is seen as a safe haven for those wanted for crimes against humanity.
Many of those hiding in the UK come from countries such as Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Rwanda, Serbia, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe.
I often wonder just when some politician is going to have the balls to go with the undeniable fact that most people in the UK don't give a damn about what happens if we send these people back. If those states want to kill, torture or generally muck their exported criminal class about upon their return, then it's no business of ours. In fact automatic deportation within a fixed time limit for immigrants/asylum seekers ought to be in the statutes if they commit a crime in this country after being allowed to stay.
The UK should never be seen as a soft touch or a soft option for anyone wanting to come and live here. In contrast though once you've passed a rigorous medical and written examination then you ought to be free within certain limits to live your life in safety here, no one wants to kick out the legally here innocent, but those who are criminals feet shouldn't even touch the ground once discovered.
The Human Rights Act ought to be called the Criminals Charter as the only people who benefit from it are the criminals.

Monday, July 29, 2013

No... it's not f___ing free!

What is it about teachers that produces so many utter thicko's where it comes to the real world? Is it to do with dealing with children leaves them in a childlike state? Or perhaps it's too much in the way of holidays clogging up the ability to keep critical thinking going?
Oh sure I know there are several great teachers out there and many who soldier on despite the activities of their unions, but surely someone needs to tell this idiot woman where to get off???
Telegraph.
All children should be issued with tablet computers to stop young people from deprived backgrounds missing out on the latest technology in lessons, it was claimed.
Christine Blower, general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said some schools were fuelling social class divisions by asking families to pay between £200 and £300 for high-tech devices to improve children’s education.
iPads should be given free to pupils – and maintained by school engineers – to make sure all children have the same opportunities without the “stigma” of coming from a poor family, she said.
The comments were made despite a squeeze on school budgets during the economic downturn.
It came after it emerged that a growing number of families were being asked to buy tablet computers for use in schools.
Basic economics here, someone has to buy the iPads, that someone is the taxpayer. That means the iPads aren't free at all save for the end user. So... why should I be buying kids free computers? It's not like anyone's going to buy me anything. It's the old leftist bleeding heart syndrome that sees the taxpayer as some sort of magic money tree. We now have a generation sponging from "the State" totally ignorant of where the money comes from and who is actually paying for it, i.e. the taxpayers, because they never get to see just how bloody hard it is for people to afford anything or save for anything because it's simply handed over to them!
Why iPads anyway? They're expensive bloody tat and there are far cheaper and more configurable alternatives around for parents to pay for, not the taxpayer.
Perhaps Christine Blower and the NUT would get a better grasp of economics if we were to take the cost of these iPads out of the unions funds?
I suspect that suggestion would go down like a lead balloon, they're far more free wioth other peoples money, it's what the moronic left do...

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Rip off jihad...

One of the more annoying things about car insurance is that despite my ever increasing no claims 'bonus' means that instead of the amount going down yearly, seems to be remaining the same, year in year out, despite using several comparison websites to try and get the best deal possible. Now I discover that our racist islamic 'friends' have a scam going too which is adding to my costs...
The Sun.
A CROOKED businessman at the centre of a car crash insurance scam which costs honest drivers £400million a year can today be exposed by The Sun.
Raja Waqas and his brother Bilal boasted that they have staged more than 200 accidents in the last seven years.
They operate a “crash for cash” racket that adds about £44 a year to each UK motor insurance policy.
Last week the pair staged a deliberate smash with another vehicle to write off our investigator’s Mercedes in Slough, Berks.
Just minutes before the “accident”, Raja said: “There’s more money in this game than drug-dealing.”
He said: “We will arrange the accident with some white man or woman. They’re innocent but will be responsible. You will be with us, the other party will say sorry to you. When it’s two Asians in the crash the insurance companies get suspicious.
Gosh, what a surprise, two 'Asians' in which we know the word Asian means muslim are ripping off ordinary people by deliberately targeting white people  in a cash for crash scam. You have the feeling if anyone got stroppy with them that they'd immediately play the race card too.
Oh I'm sure there are other businessmen out there who can be pointed out to be white and ripping us off, yet it does seem odd that The Sun investigation can only find these guys, though the police admit they are looking into 60 other suspects.
Yet once again we have people who feel no loyalty, no sense of belonging to this country trying to rip off the indigenous people simply because of sheer racism on their part. Can you imagine the outcry if you or I tried to do this to 'Asians' we'd be facing hate crime charges along with fraud.
Add this to rape jihad, benefits jihad, armed jihad, diet jihad and you wonder just why the government haven't twigged that these people are incompatible with civilised values.
Must be the Saudi oil money lining their pockets...

Saturday, July 27, 2013

The new Luddites

The Luddites were a group of textile artisans who protested against newly developed labour-saving machinery from around 1811 to 1817. They were protesting the bringing in of machinery that made products cheaper and as a consequence were losing their skilled jobs to unskilled labour. The movement was ended by mass arrests and deportations, though the name has stuck as an epithet for those who would block progress.
Mail.
Villagers blocking a rural drilling site earmarked for fracking were dragged away by police yesterday as protests turned ugly.
Around a hundred police – including trained riot officers – were brought in to break up the blockade which was in its second day in the West Sussex countryside near Balcombe.
The site, which has been selected for exploratory drilling by fracking company Cuadrilla, has attracted a growing number of protesters all week who until yesterday morning had managed to block all access from the road.
Whilst I have some sympathy for the villagers, I do happen to know that a fracking rig is a lot less obtrusive than a birdmincer and if successful a lot more cheaper to run and maintain. However the arrests weren't mostly villagers as the Mail article would seem to indicate, but professional swampies or enviroloons as I'm want to call them. These are the people who would rather our pensioners and low paid freeze to death in the winter because they can't afford to keep their houses warm. Who believe the planet is warming up and we need to go back to a brutal medieval economy to try and prevent a natural process. Essentially they are Luddites who wish to try and deny progress in any shape or form that doesn't fit into their narrow minded view on how life should be.
Natalie Hynde, 30, said she was delighted to be part of the movement and dubbed yesterday’s police reaction ‘over the top’.
Miss Hynde, who defines herself as a professional activist, has been protesting at the site entrance for four days. 
Says it all really, a professional activist who has nothing better to do.
The enviroloons won't stop progress, doesn't stop them trying of course and their influence unfortunately has the ear of some of our idiot politicians who see bird mincers as a good way to make a profit from the people of this land rather than investing in ways to keep cheap energy flowing.
The enviroloons unknowingly or not have fallen into a devils agreement with those businesses and politicians whose interests is in keeping prices high and people barely managing.
They can't see it though...

Friday, July 26, 2013

My God a Tory gets it...

About legalities and lecturing hectoring the public about something that is no concern of the government whatsoever because it's 'legal' and remains for the moment a part of freedom of choice.
Unfortunately it's about porn, not taxation, alcohol, ciggies, health...
Telegraph.
Tories should not lecture adults about their "private enjoyment of legal pornography", one of David Cameron's ministers has suggested.
Nick Boles, a Tory planning minister, intervened in the debate about pornography in the wake of the Prime Minister's crusade against children accessing sexual images online.
The senior Conservative MP strongly backed Mr Cameron's crackdown, saying the Government needs to help parents who seek to stop their children being exposed to "appalling risks and horrors" online. However, he suggested Tories should not go so far as to sound disapproving about legal pornography for adults. "As a Conservative, my starting point is that people should be free to live their lives as they choose," he said. "And I am not going to start lecturing consenting adults about their private enjoyment of legal pornography."
I don't know why politicians seem to feel they have a mandate to lecture those of us who simply wish to be left alone to enjoy our legal pastimes without having it taxed or made difficult to accomplish without jumping through some cretins hoops to obtain. I'm 54, I get asked by spotty teens in shops if I have proof I'm over 25 occasionally, because it's the 'rules' innit. It's usually the last time I visit said shop, anyone under 25 looking like me has had a hell of a hard life and would have my pity.
Yet not a day goes by without some sort of soundbite from a politician telling us what we should be doing, ban this, ban that, regulate this, regulate that. It's removing step by step personal liberty and personal choice. The fact that they are lecturing the wrong people never seems to occur to them either, they always opt for collective guilt/responsibility rather than target those who do abuse the pastime. Want to deal with drunks? Make it expensive for everyone to buy drinks. Want to prevent child abuse? Ban the internet rather than target pervs.
Whatever fixes politicians come up with it's always a blanket one and it always removes rights rather than enhances them.
Yet people still vote for the bastards...

Thursday, July 25, 2013

So which communities would these be then?

Apparently our counter terrorism people are concerned over silent communities, believing that they are increasing the threat of terrorism.
Telegraph.
Silence in communities over potential terrorists will lead to more atrocities in the UK, the outgoing counter-terrorism chief has warned.
Fanatics and “lone wolf” terrorists will be free to carry out more deadly attacks on Britain’s streets if the public do not come forward with more tip-offs, Metropolitan deputy assistant commissioner Stuart Osborne said.
He warned the attack threat is becoming smaller and less complex which means they are harder to detect but are still deadly. He said every major plot in recent years has involved innocent people who knew something about the plan but never tipped off the police. In a major foiled plot to attack the UK with eight suicide bombers, some sections of a community in Birmingham knew some members of the cell had gone to Pakistan for terror training but did not raise the alarm. Counter-terrorism police have also warned of a growing threat from far right extremism.
Aha! There we go, the terrorists went to Pakistan to train as suicide bombers. Yet completely fails to mention the fact that they were religiously fanatical of the worlds biggest threat to peace aka islam.
The mention of right wing or far right extremism is also thrown in there to try and tar groups like the EDL who are far more popular than the government would like us to believe. However as far right groups don't tend to be suicide bombers, fly off to terrorist training camps or behead people in the streets you have to wonder why they get a mention... other than the fact that the government live in fear of the growing reaction to their bringing in of an incompatible culture to the UK.
The interesting thing is that muslims are only mentioned when it comes to talk of a backlash against them. Whilst ignoring the events that led to the backlash as caused by muslims... indeed though the death of Lee Rigby is mentioned, there was no mention of who actually did it.
Essentially it's all the buzzwords of would, could and should with a remarkable dearth of actual facts to back up the fact that the silent communities are the muslim ones and the fact that groups like the EDL are feared because of this...
The far right aren't the problem, but try telling a government numpty that, they are determined to tar those who protest against extremism with those who actually do it.

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Faux Daily Mail outrage

The Daily Mail has a tendency to go off on one with articles that bear no relation to reality or over matters which aren't their business.
Mail.
Who is the man with the mosque bomb tattoo? 'EDL member' poses brazenly with inking depicting explosion at Muslim place of worship
'EDL supporter' pictured with tattoo of a mosque being blown up
Picture taken at EDL rally in Birmingham at the weekend
Man can be seen lifting up his football shirt to reveal the image as he poses
Police arrested 20 demonstrators after officers came under attack
Do you know the man with the mosque tattoo? Call us on 0203 615 1605
Grinning brazenly as he lifts up his shirt to reveal an inflammatory image of a mosque being blown up, this man was pictured openly with his offending tattoo at a far-right rally.
The man, who is believed to be a supporter of the English Defence League, is understood to have been pictured at the group's rally, in Birmingham, at the weekend.
Since when has sporting a tattoo been a crime?
Anyone else think that the tattoo doesn't look particularly real?
It seems a bit odd for the Daily Mail to discover that the EDL don't really like islamists nor islamism, one would think that they'd already know this the amount of biased articles they produce on the EDL.
There are some out there who seem to believe this is pretty much the same as burning a flag. Doesn't strike me as being the same though, it's not like he damaged anything but himself if the tattoo is real and not just done with a marker pen.
The Mail also tries to give the impression (as usual) that all the trouble was caused by the EDL.
A 20-year-old woman has been charged with violent disorder and was due to appear in court earlier this week.
The woman is of Pakistani descent and attacked the police as they led her away for screaming abuse at the EDL whilst waving a Pakistani flag.
Two men were also charged with offences connected to the EDL rally and a counter-protest in Birmingham city centre.
Shockingly neither of the two were EDL, but the UAF numpties who were throwing bricks.
Officers made a total of 20 arrests, mainly for public order breaches, after being pelted with cans, bottles, stones and other missiles during sporadic disorder.
Two, I repeat two of the arrests were EDL for drunk and disorderly, all the rest were the counter-protestors.
Personally I think the idea of the tattoo is silly, however it's his body and his right (just) under civil liberties. There are a lot worse things going on such as the grooming of underage girls, arson, (dis)honour crimes, child abuse and terrorism going on in the islamic community.
Yet we have the Mail up in arms over a tattoo.
Priorities huh?

Monday, July 22, 2013

A message from the EDL to the Archdruid of Canterbury


Telegraph.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has said he does not want to live in a "monocultural" society and condemned "unacceptable" and "inexcusable" attacks on Muslims over recent weeks.
Apart from the fact that there have been little or few attacks on muslims other than by muslims.
Of course he could be using the Tell Mama data which has been proven to be made up of course
Telegraph.
Tell Mama and Mr Mughal did not mention, however, that 57 per cent of the 212 reports referred to activity that took place only online, mainly offensive postings on Twitter and Facebook, or that a further 16 per cent of the 212 reports had not been verified. Not all the online abuse even originated in Britain.
I rather suspect the Archmoron is...
Perhaps he'd be better off looking at what the people he's defending are actually up too...

2001: "asians" behind most racist attacks:

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1160552.stm
2006: white people are the victim in half of racist murders ("political correctness stifling debate"):
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/oct/22/ukcrime.race
Racist Murders of White Men/Women by Muslims
Lee Rigby (2013)
Kieran Crump-Raiswell (2013)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2356211/Gap-year-student-Ki...
William McKeeney (2012)
kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/racist-muslims-asif-...
Victor Parsons & Keith Needell (2012)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2146328/Ali-Koc-Sadistic-ki...
Rosina Waller (2010)
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-11889364
Christopher Folkes (2009)
www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/4786313.Teenager_kicked_B...
Keith Brown (2008)
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1022815/BNP-hijack-murder-t...
Vicente Delgado (2007)
www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/146497/.html
Andrew Holland
www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/2036526.thug_stabbed_victim_the...
Christopher Yates (2005)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4463142.stm
Mary-Ann Leneghan (2005)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/berkshire/4953362.stm
Kris Donald (2004)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Gavin Hopley (2003)
scot.altermedia.info/insecurity-ethnic-mixing/justice-for-ga...
Charlene Downes (2003)
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1552482/Missing-girls-body-p...
Ross Parker (2001)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Ross_Parker

Aaron Dugmore, 9 (2013)

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Dugmore
Christina Edkins, 16 (2013)

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2289518...-journey-school.html
David Ryding, 26 (2013)

www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/local-news...g-death-race-5098626
Danny O'Shea, 18 (2011)

en.metapedia.org/wiki/Danny_O%27Shea


It makes quite a list of people attacked, missing or murdered by the none indigenous of this country.
Yet what does the Archdruid do? He attacks those who are exposing the barbarism in society by using figures which appear to have been drawn from thin air!
He even mentions attacks on mosques, most of which after some sensational headlines go strangely quiet after it turns out the perpetrators weren't white or English.
Basically he's attacking the majority for something they haven't even done.
Astonishingly he doesn't mention the bloodstained borders surrounding islamic states next to non islamic ones. He doesn't mention the plight of the Copts in Egypt, the terrorised Christian communities in Iraq and Syria the persecution of Christians in Pakistan ...
Basically the list of islamic barbarism is endless and the Archmoron chooses to attack some minor (if true) incidents!
What happened to Lee Rigby was unacceptable... What happened next whilst bad doesn't even come close.
The Archmoron ought to read the sign held up by the EDL member and perhaps contemplate that before opening his ignorant mouth to shove his foot in it!

Sunday, July 21, 2013

It's a search engine you moron, it's what it does

Cameron seems to think he has a new hobbyhorse to ride with Google and child porn images. Certainly there's a lot of concern about such images, but, and it's a big but, I don't know what he expects Google to actually do about it.
BBC.
The prime minister has warned internet companies that they need to act to block access to child abuse images on the internet or face legal controls.
David Cameron told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show search firms like Google needed to do more to block results from "depraved and disgusting" search terms.
Google said when it discovers child abuse images it acts to remove them.
But Labour said the PM's plans did not go "far enough" and criticised cuts to online child abuse policing budgets.
Google is one of a number of firms which recently agreed on measures to step up the hunt for abusive images.
Why do I get the feeling that Cameron doesn't know just how many images the google-spiders actually find and place links to on the various servers around the world? Why do i have the feeling that he doesn't realise that someone has to actually look at and report on such images in order to block them? I wonder if he realises that Google isn't responsible for what is on other peoples servers?
There's also the problem that what might be illegal in one country is perfectly legal in another and whilst most people look down on depravity and child abuse with contempt the cut off age in differing countries is a bit hazy. After all the age of legal consent in the UK is 16, in the USA it's mostly 18, in France it's 15 and in Spain it's 14. So Cameron is trying to push a faux morality out into the big wide world which probably won't work all too well.
Nor would I expect that the real abusers out there will be using public servers anyway, I suspect that the abusers use a variety of tools and forums in countries which don't give a damn what Cameron or indeed Google think.
By all means deal with graphic images of child abuse when you find them, we have laws in place for this. But trying to blame Google for what it does simply won't work. I doubt Google could afford to employ enough people to check every image that comes up on its engine.
But that's common sense and Cameron is being emotive in a vote garnering exercise here. Personally I suspect he couldn't give a damn if his proposals are working or not, this is about votes, not reality.

Saturday, July 20, 2013

A good day

Yesterday was the most wonderful day for my step-daughter and her new husband. The weather was perfect, the guest well behaved and the setting perfect. I can heartily recommend the Black Horse, Thurnham, Kent to anyone planning marrying a son or daughter off.

The happy couple.
I can't remember a wedding where everything went to plan... this one came close though. Even my speech produced a few laughs and an awful lot of groans at the puns used.
The evening do was brilliant too, no fights, no arguments just a lot of people from both sides of the new family having a hell of a good time.
We all ate too much, drank too much and danced too much.
Life truly is good some days...

Friday, July 19, 2013

Parish Notice

No political blogging today as I'm off to make sure my step-daughter gets married.
Oh yes, I have to do the father of the bride speech too.
My step-daughter is now apparently dreading it...
Mostly because I know some hilarious secrets she'd rather the world not know about her.
Oh yes...
She's blonde...
That should give you an inkling ;-)

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Different from Asians... I suppose

Apparently the police have arrested two men for trying to blow up a mosque. They are described as Eastern Europeans...
The left and the liberal political classes are said to be gutted that the perpetrators are not those horribly racist English, though are still pushing the boat out to try and find a link... any link to the men and the EDL.
Express.
West Midlands Police said two Eastern Europeans, aged 25 and 22, were detained by officers from the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit in Small Heath, Birmingham, at about 3pm on Thursday.
The pair have now been arrested under the Terrorism Act and are being questioned on suspicion of being involved in the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism following blasts near the Aisha Mosque and Islamic Centre in the Caldmore area of Walsall last month and the Tipton mosque last Friday.
I suppose I could point out that there are muslim enclaves in Albania and the former Yugoslavia and those muslims are Eastern European too along with a large segment of Turkey...
Also a quick look on Google Maps Streetview at where they were arrested (Talbot Way, Birmingham) unsurprisingly shows it is a fully Islamified area.
It's entirely possible they attacked the mosque because 'they' were the wrong type of muslims.
Of course this is pure speculation on my part, but it's not exactly unknown is it now? Shia's hate sunni's and they both hate the only decent bunch the Ahmadiyya muslims who were the only muslims to hold a tribute to Lee Rigby and have eschewed violence.
Still I'll wait and see, islams civil war still seems a likely suspect though.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

His masters voice...

Another day another U turn by the government. First it was plain packaging for cigarettes, now it's minimum alcohol pricing (Though only in England and Wales as the Scots have their own puritans to put up with) I'm sure there will be a lot of talk about why the measure was dropped, but the real reason is that Cameron's masters said no.
BBC.
The government has shelved plans to introduce a minimum price for a unit of alcohol in England and Wales.
Minister Jeremy Browne said the policy would remain "under consideration" but there were fears the change would hit responsible drinkers.
A ban on multi-buy promotions has been rejected but sales will not be allowed below the cost of alcohol duty and VAT.
Labour said the government had done a U-turn on a flagship policy that both the PM and home secretary had backed.
Mr Browne said problem drinking turned towns and cities into effective "no-go areas" for many people, was seen as instrumental in many violent attacks and cost the taxpayer £21bn a year in crime and health issues.
Usual bollocks by Labour, the real reason most people drink and get into bother is the fact that politicians have made us so bloody miserable. There are laws to deal with drunks and drunken behaviour, might make a change to actually apply them rather than dance around the edges.
Anyhoo... The real reason Cameron dropped the measure is that what was proposed was against EU laws and we all know despite what he says, Cameron is in love with the stinking corrupt edifice. So having been unable to find a way around EU law, he was forced to drop the measure. Not that I'd expect you to read that in the MSM but as far as I can tell that's the real reason.
That the measure was manifestly unfair to responsible drinkers made not one jot of difference to the control freaks who infest parliament and if you read the full article you can read the dribble they come out with though it is nausea inducing.
Interfering with freedom of choice is always a risky business for any organisation, unfortunately, politicians cannot seem to learn this lesson and find more and more ways to interfere.
Then they wonder why they lose power...

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Or we could just sterilise you and put your kids into care

Just joking...
Though it's not funny...
Express.
A "SUPER-FERTILE" unemployed mum-of-six and her jobless husband are demanding a four-bedroom council house for their family.
Maggie Flisher, 26, and husband Gavin, 30, currently live in a cramped one-bedroom flat while claiming £27,000 in benefits.
Mrs Flisher, who does not work as she is depressed, said the reason she has six children under the age of eight is because contraception is no match for her fertility.
Yes I sort of sympathise with the woman, all my kids were conceived whilst contraception was in use. However after the third I decided that a vasectomy would 'cure' the problem of any more sprogs turning up.
It also meant that I could work and support my family.
I believe everyone has a right to have as many babies as they like, but, other than a bit of support for the first two, no one has the right to expect to be paid for them. You should have them only if you can afford them and you shouldn't expect the taxpayer to stump up for your mistakes/lifestyle choice.
Mrs Flisher, who does not work as she is depressed.
Clearly not 'that' depressed if she has a sex life... or perhaps that's why she's depressed, the pic of her man gives another possible reason too...
The most depressing thing of all is that the leftards in the Labour party are discussing enshrining the right to steal from taxpayers social benefits as part of the reviled Human Rights Act.
God help England...
God help us all.

Monday, July 15, 2013

A waste of time and money

I'm sure most here are familiar at least with the term strawman when it comes to debate and discussion. It generally means...  a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
There is however another term or common phrase... 'you cannot sue a man of straw'
It means that you should not attempt to sue a man of straw as they will have no money to pay for the case even if you win.
Express.
WELSH rock heroes Manic Street Preachers are said to be considering legal action after the English Defence League (EDL) used one of their songs to promote a rally.
Correction, the EDL didn't, an individual of the EDL used the song, the EDL have their own public relations people and the use of the song wasn't sanctioned by the EDL.
'If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next,' which became the group's first number one single in 1998, was used as the soundtrack to a video on the EDL's website.
Indeed it did, it was linked too from YouTube, as are a lot of videos made by patriots and opponents of the EDL. Linking to an official source generally means that any legal action will be pointless or useless. Incidentally Youtube haven't pulled it as of writing.
EDL supporters clearly misunderstood the song's sentiment, as it is actually a call to arms for anti-fascists and was inspired by the rise of General Franco in the Spanish civil war.
Um no, EDL supporters recognise a fascistic totalitarian control system masquerading as a religion when they see it. Islam is fascistic, hence the producer used a song about fascism...
The producer used the song to highlight the beheading of Lee Rigby, if we tolerate this, then our children will be next... get it?
I know the guy who produced the video, he comments on the EDL forum where I'm a moderator. He he still lives with his parents and has no savings hence the man of straw comment...
Sometimes you just wonder at the desperation of the MSM and the leftards in society.

Here's the video link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=twW0ruikhPg

Sunday, July 14, 2013

But I thought it was a 'religion of peace?'

Someone in the government is clearly not 'on message' after all what else could you think about Education Secretary Michael Gove's decision to block the opening of a 'primary' school for muslims on the grounds that it is linked to Islamic extremism? After all, after the butchery of Lee Rigby, we had David Cameron telling us that the barbarism wasn't 'islam' and that islam is a religion of peace, though admittedly fewer people are inclined to believe this view than ever before these days...
Mail.
A flagship free school has been blocked by Michael Gove following claims that it is linked to Islamic extremism.
The Education Secretary pulled the plug on the Muslim-inspired Northern Lights primary school in Halifax, Yorkshire, following a three-month investigation.
Ministers ordered the inquiry after complaints that a local Islamic centre had circulated a leaflet suggesting that Muslim parents who failed to support the free school would be condemned.
The leaflet said: ‘If it was said to us, “If you do not attend this meeting your child will die,” I am certain we would all make sure we attend the meeting.
‘What I am about to address... is even more serious than death and that is for us and our children to be safe on the Day of Judgment.’
Free schools are state-funded but operate independently of town halls and Northern Lights, which was to be run with a Muslim ethos, was due to open in September.
However, despite its denials that it endorsed the leaflet or extremist views, Ministers voiced worries about ‘inclusiveness and governance’.
Calderdale Council had written to Mr Gove warning about the ‘close links’ between the Sunniyy Islamic Centre and the school.
And David Whalley, the council’s Head of Learning, said: ‘The potential risk of a negative impact on community relations within the area is high.’
Lovely bunch of people I'm sure in the local islamic centre and clealy off message too, though they were talking to other muslims so possibly not, after all with other muslims they don't have to pretend.
Seems also off message were the local council who are clearly islamophobes and bigots, they have a single BNP member so that makes it obvious, clearly he/she has brainwashed the other 50 members into seeing things the wrong way... (sarcasm)
I mean what is the media and the powers that be to do when their pet islamics keep getting into the news for all the wrong reasons, there's only so many good news stories and blame offsetting that can be done. It's even come to the stage where blaming the EDL has become counter-productive as no-one believes for a moment that the EDL do half the things they are accused of. (more sarcasm)
Still it is bad when the Education Secretary himself can't be bothered to toe the official line that islam is a pink fluffy bunny religion that wouldn't hurt a fly and is clearly being maligned by right wing thugs and hooligans who are forcing good muslims into self defenceing their good intents by the odd beheading and bomb attack. (even more sarcasm)
This unfortunately is the result of inviting in a fascistic totalitarian cult masquerading as a religion who have no qualms about threats or lying in order to forward their plans for world dominance. That they have fooled some politicians and the media is a given (not terribly hard really) but that they continue to forward the lie that theirs is a religion of peace despite the overwhelming evidence against this statement is simply gobsmacking as is the media and political narrative that continues to say this too.
Their problem now is that no one believes the narrative any more.
There is and should be no place for islam in a civilised society... end of...

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Blue on blue?

Whenever I hear of a mosque being burned or a muslim attacked my hypocrisy sensor starts twitching, pretty much as it has done over the BBC headlines over the mosque in Tipton bombing being a terrorist attack. The reason being of course that the only terrorists operating in the UK at the moment are of course muslims...
BBC.
An explosion which left nails and debris strewn outside a mosque was "an act of terrorism", police have said.
The blast happened on a disused railway line near Binfield Street in Tipton in the West Midlands at about 13:00 BST.
A nearby shopkeeper said: "I did tell the police there to evacuate the area, please for god's sake - there were nails all over the place."
Counter terrorism officers were called in and the surrounding area was closed off for several hours.
I can pretty much guarantee you that the culprit if found, won't be a member of the EDL or other patriot groups, but will have links to the islamic community as the arrested person for the Somali community centre is as the teens arrested for burning the islamic school are.
There is a concerted effort going on at the moment to try and put muslims back into the victim category which the liberal leftist  want them to be in whilst calling the rest of us racist bigots. Problem for the liberal leftists being that it's a case of shutting the barn door after the horse has fled.
It's also noticeable that the bomb was placed when there were few people about, I rather doubt that anyone not connected with the community would know the normal times, never mind the ramadam times. As with a previous bomb, I can't help but suspect that these are attempts to garner sympathy. If they aren't then it's probably a sunni/shia thing.
My opinion such as it is, is that this was muslims bombing muslims, not unheard of and definitely one of their more obnoxious habits during ramadam.

Friday, July 12, 2013

Ramadama ding dong...

What is it about teachers that they feel obliged to force the islamic hate religion on our kids? It's not as if most kids would be interested in being indoctrinated into the violent cult despite the false claims that it's a religion of peace. Yet because it's the bit of the islamic faith where they starve themselves and others the teachers seem to believe that on one of the hottest days of the year that non-muslim kids should be denied water too in case it upsets the barbarians muslim kids.
Mail.
An angry mother has accused a primary school of denying her child water on one of the hottest days of the year for fear of upsetting pupils observing Ramadan.
Kora Blagden, 32, claimed a teacher at her son Luke’s school refused to let the 10-year old drink from his water bottle because it was unfair to fasting classmates.
Many pupils at Charles Dickens Primary School, Portsmouth, Hampshire, are fasting during Ramadan, which means they refrain from taking food or water between sunrise and sunset for around 30 days, depending on the moon.
Yes it's the old offence by proxy, though in this case the school has gone into emergency denial mode...
The school said there was no ban on children from other religions having food and drink during Ramadan but refused to comment on this individual case.
In other words they realise one of their staff has been caught out and are seeking damage limitation.
Yet it's not unknown for schools toinsist on taking kids to mosques without parental permission, it's also not unknown for them to give a false accounting of the islamic faith as espoused by politicians, the moronic left and the BBC wherein islam is not to be criticised as it offends muslims. Though to most of us the right to offend comes along with the right to be offended so long as it doesn't involve violence.
Frankly I hope the mother along with the school takes this teacher to task for child abuse, but i won't hold my breath. Nor would I hold my breath on any muslim being prosecuted because their religion says it's ok to not feed their kids in summer during the day.
I really do not believe that there is a place for islam in a civilised society.

Thursday, July 11, 2013

Magistrates in common sense shocker

We've all heard the tales of people moving from the city into the countryside who have immediately tried it on because of the natural noises therein. A classic example was a council telling a church to cease and desist with its church bells despite it having been done over 140 years due to one solitary complaint.
There have been others, but it seems that some magistrates have a far better grasp on common sense than councils...
Mail.
A magistrate has laughed a council out of court after they hauled a rural farmer to the dock for failing to stop his chickens crowing too loudly.
Anthony Block, 52, laughed when he first heard Braintree District Council's plan to drag him in front of magistrates over his free range chicken farm near Finchingfield, Essex.
Mr Block is accused of falling fowl of a noise abatement order he received three years ago calling on him to prevent his chickens ‘crowing at a level likely to result in reasonable cause for complaint from occupiers of nearby residential properties'.
But despite baffled magistrates refusing to enforce a fine, Mr Block has still been left with £115 legal costs and a criminal record following the barmy conviction.
He said: 'What next? Are they going to complain about the birds in the trees being too noisy?
'My business has been here since 2002 and all of a sudden they are too noisy - it just doesn't make any sense.
Naturally with the process being part of the punishment Mr Block has ended up with a criminal record anyway, no doubt the local plod have his DNA squirrelled away against the day he becomes really dangerous too...
The complainant also refused to give an interview when asked too, can't think why, save perhaps embarrassment and getting their name in the press and gaining notoriety as an idiot?
Still I suppose it could be worse, we might have some idiot complaining about the film 'The Railway Children' encouraging kids to play on or near the tracks...
Oh bloody hell!!!

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

And this is news???

Apparently there's some concern about the English actually believing themselves to be... well, English. Apparently the English are supposed to consider themselves as British, rather than English as it gives the UK government a tea towel of legitimacy with regards to the Scots, Welsh and Irish having their own parliaments/assemblies. The fact that the English alone of the indigenous peoples of Europe do not have their own parliament seems to have escaped the people concerned who appears would rather we simply went away and became British again...
Express.
MORE than a third of people living in the UK identify themselves as English, rather than British, a new report has revealed.
The landmark report has found that the numbers in England voluntarily describing themselves as British is the lowest of any survey since 1996.
The news came as plans emerged allowing England’s MPs a veto on issues not affecting Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland.
35 per cent of those living in Britain place their English identity before any sense of Britishness, the report has said, while just one-in-ten claims “to be more British than English”.
“Englishness is emerging more clearly as a result of devolution elsewhere in the UK,” says Welsh academic, Richard Wyn Jones, the co-author of England and its Two Unions, the report published by the Institute of Public Policy Research.
“What has emerged is a different kind of Anglo-British identity in which the ‘Anglo’ component is increasingly considered the primary source of identity,” the report said.
You can almost feel the collective horror of the liberal leftist ruling classes as they suddenly believe themselves assailed by the horribly racist English  For indeed that is what it is to be English in their eyes and why they spent the last 70 years trying to stamp it out.
Even minor reforms such as giving English MP's the power of veto over any legislation regarding England alone does not seem to have stemmed the tide as more and more of the indigenous population regard themselves as something the political classes regard as rather beyond the pale.
You can often see the surprise when you confront a liberal/leftist with the details that the only British thing about you is your passport and you'd change that if you could. The fact that most have no problems with the other countries of the UK saying the same rather shows them up as the narrow minded bigots that they are.
I expect Englishness and the belief that people are English first and foremost to grow amongst the indigenous population of England. It's a form of rebellion and frankly more than overdue.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Warning bells

It's interesting watching the big three political parties of the UK disintegrating and losing members left, right and centre. It's also pretty much a given that sooner or later they'll opt for state funding of their parties, no doubt using the excuse that it will prevent corruption by outside donors demanding favours. Though what it will do is entrench the corruption that is the politicians in place funded by the taxpayer who may very well not want the corrupt bastards to have any money at all from them.
Labour have their union 'problem' but now the Tories have a new problem in that their grass root members no longer believe in the party...
Mail.
One in five Tory members is thinking of voting for the UK Independence Party at the next election, a poll has revealed.
More than half feel they are not respected by David Cameron, despite years of service to their local Conservative associations.
And many feel alienated by some of the Prime Minister’s flagship policies, with 59 per cent saying they oppose gay marriage and 67 per cent opposed to increases in the budget for foreign aid.
The rare insight into feeling among the Tory activists will make for worrying reading for party strategists.
It reveals a growing disconnect between Mr Cameron and his members, with almost half saying they now spend no time campaigning for his re-election as Prime Minister.
Many of them are actively considering switching to back UKIP, in a major boost for Nigel Farage’s party.
The damning verdict comes just two months after party relations were shattered by claims a senior Tory figure had dismissed activists as 'swivel-eyed loons'.
Cameron's problem is that a lot of party activists do not like where he's taking the party, they do not like his stance on the EU, his views on gay marriage or giving taxpayers cash to overseas kleptocracies. The Tories are worried about Ukip, but what's not being said is that Labour are also starting to get worried too as many people who in the past have voted Labour, now appear to be prepared to vote Ukip too. The Lib Dems as ever are discovering that being in power means being unpopular and wish to go back to being the party of permanent opposition, though interestingly enough they look as if they may go bankrupt first.
Now I have no idea how Ukip will do in the next general election, they may very well pick up the anyone but the big two vote that the Lib Dems used to get. I do suspect that Ukip will walk the next EU elections in first place by a long way. After that it will get interesting as Labour and the Tories will probably try to show off their EUskeptic roots and try to woo back voters. Though i suspect a lot of MP's hearts might not be fully in it.
We may truly be living in interesting (political) times.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Just business as usual

I was born in South Shields, in the North-East of England and spent my formative years in Gateshead so I kind of know the mindset of the people who will vote for a donkey so long as it was wearing a red rosette. That some come to their senses and see just how bad the socialist/leftist mentality is taken advantage of by the unions and the Labour party is a given, however the mindset of the unions and the Labour party in using the system to advance themselves is now becoming a bit of a scandal. Particularly when the one who pays the piper now seems hell bent on calling the tune.
Telegraph.
The Conservatives have asked the Metropolitan Police to investigate Labour's candidate selection process in two further constituencies, it has emerged.
Bob Neill, a Tory vice-chairman, has written to Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the Met Police Commissioner, asking him to look into allegations of possible fraud relating to Ilford North and Lewisham Deptford, both in Greater London.
It comes after Labour handed over evidence to police in Scotland about claims that the Unite union tried to fix the result of a candidate selection in Falkirk by packing the constituency with members, whose subscriptions it paid. Mr Neill described Falkirk as "the tip of the iceberg", noting that a leaked Unite document suggested the union was getting involved in the choice of a candidate for the 2015 general election in 41 seats across the country. In his letter to the Commissioner, Mr Neill said: "I am concerned that this instance is just the tip of the iceberg, as Unite themselves admit they are targeting at least another 40 Labour Party parliamentary selections for similar treatment. Senior Labour Party sources have also confessed that the problems go wider than just Falkirk."
Whilst this is probably just another piece of Tory mischief-making, the guy does have a point as Unite have a very strong presence in the Labour party and can influence policy by the tightening of the purse strings. You can imaging the reaction if say a private company did the same with the Tories and were caught in similar circumstances. The left and the BBC would go apeshit over the matter rather than just try to do damage limitation. Yet clearly in Falkirk, Unite broke the law by enrolling their members without their knowledge as part of the local Labour party and used their votes to try and influence the candidature of their own man. This is exactly the way Militant Tendency worked in the past to get their people into power and nearly wrecked the Labour party, certainly made them unelectable for a generation.
So perhaps it is right that an investigation is begun...
Even if my own thoughts on the matter is that anything that makes a leftish party unelectable is a good thing.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Never forgive, never forget...

Eight years ago today the followers of the vile totalitarian fascistic creeed masquerading as a religion called islam added another chapter to the ever increasing total of their crimes against humanity.


The good people in London weren't the first, nor the last, but should have been the wake up call our imbecile politicians needed to rid us of this poison in our midst.
Instead we were told 'this wasn't islam'
Of course it was bloody islam!

Friday, July 5, 2013

Parish Notice

No blogging over the weekend as I'm off to darkest Essex for a family get together where I'll eat too much and drink too much with a bit of luck.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Gosh, well fancy that...

I don't like the BBC, I'll use them as a news source, but where possible I won't use them where the news source is biased by their agenda, without pointing out said agenda, I do the same with any other news source. However a report out seems to recognise what I and many others knew to be a fact, that the BBC is simply not to be trusted when it comes to certain subjects and it's liberal left bias comes to the fore.
Express.
THE BBC was guilty of a “deep liberal bias” which led it to ignore widespread public concern about immigration, a scathing report said yesterday.
Journalists disregarded forecasts that net immigration was set to soar and members of the public were even blocked from complaining about the influx on a BBC phone-in.
TV bosses were also “slow” to catch up with the growth in support for Britain to quit the EU, as has been championed by the Daily Express.
The damning verdict was delivered yesterday in an independent report into impartiality and bias in BBC journalism commissioned by the BBC Trust, the body that overseas the broadcaster.
Immigration is not the only area in which the BBC promotes a definite bias, it's treatment of Israel in the middle east, as well as the EU along with it's political programs giving an easy ride to Labour/leftist spokesmen but rigorously and often rudely interrogating those of the so called right and independents.
Yet the BBC for years blithely kept to the neutral/unbiased line despite it being blatantly obvious that they were neither. There is even a website BiasedBBC which is constantly monitoring and exposing said bias.
Yet the BBC did nothing.
Their response to the report?
The BBC has now vowed to appoint “story champions” to pressure editors into giving more broadcast time to “important and long-running news stories.”
Executives also promised to “widely and systematically” share audience views.
One wonders which stories the BBC will champion? It's not as if they have a great track record now is it....

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Entitlement

The left are obsessed with class distinctions, they define themselves as working class, though mostly those in positions of power are anything but. They have abrogated their right to speak for the working class of the UK mostly by standing for and defending things which the working class totally disapprove of. Immigration, theft, corruption, racism (against whites) generally doing everything that the common man totally disapproves of.
Mail.
A council boss was arrested today after allegedly giving himself a £26,000 pay rise while other staff had had their wages frozen as part of the national austerity drive.
Anthony O'Sullivan, chief executive of the Labour-controlled Caerphilly council in South Wales, was questioned by police on suspicion of fraud and misconduct in public office.
Most employees of the council have had their annual pay rise limited to just one per cent in a bid to save money - but O'Sullivan was awarded a salary hike of nearly 20 per cent thanks to a report he wrote himself.
His salary was increased from £132,000 to £158,000, and 20 other top bosses also received similarly outsized increases following a secretive meeting to determine executives' salaries.
It's a bit like giving a kid the key to a sweetshop allowing those in power the means to determine their own pay and perks. It didn't work for Westminster and it surely doesn't work at local government levels.
I am presuming that this guy is a Labour supporter of course, but it seems likely working in the public services providing a role as a chief executive, after all that's where a lot of Labour supporting placemen (and women) ended up. I can't imagine either that a Labour run council would accept anyone not sympathetic to their cause either come to that.
Still it goes to show that those in charge of us via elections and those they choose to run things are less than equal to the task.
Perhaps it's time to get rid of them all and bring in a law preventing anyone who has ever served as a councillor or a member of the local government administration from ever holding a post in local (or national) government ever again.

Monday, July 1, 2013

The procedure is part of the punishment

A year and a half ago, Emma West made the headlines for all the wrong reasons when she was caught on camera venting forth on race with her child sat on her knee. She was immediately villified by the establishment and the left as well as various pressure groups over her words, all taken from the fragments of the event filmed on someone's phone.
That there was a lot more to the story, seemed not to matter to those attacking the lady. She was also treated far differently to other characters letting forth about race and religion, but the establishment mostly ignored those or gave them a quick metaphorical slap on the wrist as they were done by 'people of colour' so different rules applied, cultural thing, natch.
BBC.
A woman who was filmed shouting racist abuse on a London tram in a video watched by 11 million people has been given a community sentence.
Emma West, 34, of New Addington, admitted racially-aggravated disorderly behaviour likely to cause harassment or distress at Croydon Crown Court.
West was filmed shouting racist abuse at passengers travelling on a tram between Croydon and Wimbledon.
She was bound over to keep the peace and handed a 24-month community order.
A judge said West was clearly suffering from mental health problems at the time of the outburst.
One and a half years and it was so serious that she received a community order.
One wonders just what the hell was going on in those 18 months, though as the title suggests, the procedure for speaking your mind is part of the punishment.
Yes Emma West had mental health problems, but the one thing that repeatedly came out from people who knew her was that her outburst was caused by something the person filming her rant either didn't see or chose to edit out. The person Emma was ranting at had deliberately spat at her feet when she asked them if they could move. Now I'm not saying that what she did was advisable, though freedom of speech took a bit of a knock when she was arrested for doing so, but, I doubt I would be any too happy had someone done the same to me.
As it is, I wish Emma well and a chance to put all this behind her, she got to keep her child despite attempts to seize him and hopefully will get the help she needs.
As for the rest of us...
Put up and SHUT UP!!!!